[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Putting in my 2p again

[bamajenny12]

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kathryn 
  To: HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Putting in my 2p again


  Joe

  As an American, I only have a passing familiarity with the Monarchy,
  but if I'm not mistaken, in Camilla's youth, she would have been a
  most *INAPPROPRIATE* candidate for Charles.  As a Catholic, I don't
  think Camilla would have stood a chance of marrying Charles 30 years
  ago.  Aside from Camilla being a divorcee, the continued love and
  respect of the people for Dianna, Camilla's Catholicism is still a
  major sticker.

  I believe it was a mariage that could not have taken place 30 years
  ago.

  Kathryn:
  She must have changed her religion because if she was Catholic Charles would
  have to remove himself from the Line of Succession and he hasn't.

  Now Jenny:
  I just read an article yesterday about the wedding that included
  a recap of Charles and Camilla's relationship. That article said
  nothing about her being Catholic. It said that they didn't marry
  30 years ago because at that time it would not have been appropriate for Charles to marry someone who was not of royal
  blood, or was not a virgin. Thinking back to Diana, didn't she
  have a gynacological exam to confirm that she was a virgin? So
  maybe that was the big deal, instead of Camilla's religion or
  blood line. I think the point with Diana (if I remember
  correctly) was the Prince must marry a virgin to 'guarantee' the
  blood line with the children.



  Jenny



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]