Warning: Adults Only - Dan Radcliffe - Full

[Kayla Pittillo]

--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Wolfie!" <wuff at ...> wrote:
>
>
> > while I agree that it is *normal* or more appropriately *natural*
> > there ARE laws that must be dealt with and I for one wouldn't
desire
> > to do time, or have any child of mine do time for sexual "crimes"
> > such as seeing a piece of genitalia, having sex with another
minor or
> > nuzzling a teacher's boob.
>
> Nobody mentioned a crime... nudity isn't a crime, nor is an erection
> or a lactation, or even a penetration.
>
> Letme put it to you that if all the penises in the world were
felled by
> some disease, and none worked at all, the world would go insane in a
> month.
>
> You would have nothing but news stories on limp willies all over the
> place, and people would *grow up* real fast.
>
> > Daniel is legally an adult,
> > right? how would it be if he were 14, and this accidentally
happened?
>
> What do you mean "accidentally"
> he's acting and there's nudity... that's no accident.
>
> > I tell you, he'd likely be charged as a sexual deviant and be put
> > into jail, where he'd end up being gang raped or something like
that.
> > That is often the case with minors here in the states. they do
> > something "wrong" and they end up being abused worse than the
crime
> > they were tried for.
>
> Jail isn't the greatest of places for anyone to be.
>
> > Therefore I don't begrudge the warning. If it keeps some zealous
> > parent or child care provider from doing much more than they
should,
> > I'm for it.
>
> Nah, more tits on the superbowl, I say.
>
> Hell,if I were on Oprah, I'd show them all my nipple.


Let me put it to you this way. I don't mind the fact young Mr.
Radcliffe presumably appeared nude in public.

I don't mind graphic depections of genitals.

I have no objection to expression of one's being.

What I do object to is the fact there are so called morals police
that pitch a fit when a mother nurses a child with her breast instead
of a bottle.

I object to people policing other people's morality and nature.

With that in mind, I don't oppose a warning when a link to nudity is
being posted, simply because I don't want some curious teenager to
end up being prosecuted because his or her parents and religious
leader don't want him or her exposed to sexuality in any way, shape,
or form.

It's the morals police that get me. Not the nudity.

sine_sim_fan