Warning: Adults Only - Dan Radcliffe - Full

[kempermentor]

> sine_sim_fan wrote:
> 
> With that in mind, I don't oppose a warning when a link to nudity is
> being posted, simply because I don't want some curious teenager to
> end up being prosecuted because his or her parents and religious
> leader don't want him or her exposed to sexuality in any way, shape,
> or form.
> 
> It's the morals police that get me. Not the nudity.
> 

Kemper now:

a side comment before the main... a request to you and Wolfie, it 
would be easier for me to read if you site who you're quoting and you 
say when it's you that replying.  Please and thank you. 

I agree with you, ssf, regarding the moral police.  But by requesting 
a warning is a loss to freedom and a win to the moral police (I 
prefer 'moral terrorists' as police should have a more positive 
connotation).

Nudity is not sexuality.  
Limp penis: nudity
Erect penis: sexuality
professional message: nudity
happy ending: sexuality

Kemper