In support of my Prince Harry theory.

[kempermentor]

steve wrote earlier:
> > > As a professional writer this might sound a bit
> > strange, I have not 
> > read any of the Novels I prefer the movies which from my
> > perspective  are far more entertaining.

> > Magpie asked reasonably:
> > But how would you know the movies are far more entertaining
> > if you haven't read the books?

> steve answered:
> My first experience in the Harry Potter world was renting the
Sorcerers Stone upon its release way back when. I made the decision
then that I wouldn't read the books and watch the movies as well. As
to your question, I have through the years participated as a member of
a number of Harry Potter groups. I have a strict policy of not getting
drawn into a debate over the Harry Potter books versus the Movies.

Kemper now:
Hi Steve, and welcome!
I understand not wanting to participate in debate over book v movies,
but I think what magpie was asking is how you can find one genre over
the other "far more entertaining" as you put it earlier when you have
no experience with the books.  Or are you trying to say something else?

If you respond, would you please bottom post (like I just did with you
post after rearranging it to make it more understandable)... it makes
it far more easier to read.  Thank you!

Kemper