JK Rowling pens a Harry Potter prequel / War of Roses/Holmes?Figg/Walpurga
susanmcgee48176
Schlobin at aol.com
Tue Jun 3 05:57:52 UTC 2008
Okay, first about the prequel. JKR says she felt like an addict having
a relapse...
I think she'll be like Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (although allegedly he
did it for the money) who HAD to resurrect Sherlock Holmes after
killing him at the Reichenbach (spelling?) Falls...
She'll have to do a prequel..and I'd LOVE the story of Mrs. Figg,
particularly as a young woman, and what about Mr. Figg - was he a
wizard, was he killed by Lord Voldemort?...I'd like Tales of the
Original Order of the Phoenix....
Just found out that Sirius' mother's name was Walpurga (hmmm, the men
in the family were all stars or constellations - Orion, Sirius,
Regulus...but she had a Germanic name! And is that a reference to
Walpurga's night...wasn't that in Faust?
OKAY, the WAR of the ROSES...one of my favorite topics.
The whole DEAL is that Edward III had too many sons!
Edward the Black Prince, whose son Richard became Richard II
Lionel, Duke of Clarence, second son
John of Gaunt (who married Blanche, off Lancaster, and who himself
became Duke of Lancaster).
Edmund, Earl of Cambridge, one of the progenitors of the Yorkist
dynasties...
and Thomas of Woodstock
After Edward III, it goes
Richard II, grandson of Edward III through Edward the Black Prince
Henry IV, (who overthrew Richard II), who was the son of John of Gaunt,
Duke of Lancaster, by Blanche of Lancaster.
Henry V, son of Henry IV (or Agincourt, and Shakespearian fame)
Henry VI, son of Henry V
Here's where it gets complicated.
The Duke of York overthrew Henry VI - Richard, the third duke of York
was the great-grandson of Edmund of Langley, fourth son of Edward III
through his father, and the grandson of Lionel, second son of Edward II
through his mother Anne de Mortimer. His mother's claim was more
important, even though he was the duke of "York." He died before
attaining the throne.
HIS SON, was the next king
Edward IV, Duke of York, was the next king succeeded by his brother
Richard III (a horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse) who may have
murdered the two princes in the tower (Edward IV's two sons).
And even more complicated...the next king was Henry VII.
HIS claim to the throne was that 1) his father, Owen Tudor, married the
widow of Henry IV... and 2) he was the great grandson of John of Gaunt
(go back up to Edward III) through his mistress and later wife,
Katherine Swynford...
Also, interesting, he married the eldest daughter of Edward IV...
(combining the red rose of Lancaster and the White Rose of York into a
red and white Tudor Rose)...and so really, Henry VIII was as much
Plantagenet, (Yorkist) as any king of England.
Also, very interesting, is that all kinds of monarchs had as their
ancestors John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, and his mistress/wife
Katharine Swynford...the Tudors, Edward IV/Richard III, and the kings
of Scotland and Great Britain who succeeded Elizabeth I.
Susan
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive