The war about The War of the Roses

[a_svirn]

> > a_svirn:
> > I've read it. I think it is quite good though, naturally, biased. 
> > Funnily enough, I've never read a good pro-Lancastrian novel. 
> > 
> 
> Potioncat:
> I discovered historical fiction in my teens. For some reason all I 
ever 
> stumbled across were from the Lancastrian point of views. (Carol 
would 
> consider them unreliable narrators!)(that's a joke) So I was 
absolutely 
> shocked the first time I read a pro-York novel. None of the Yorks 
had 
> horns!
> 

Oh, I don't think reliability is a requirement. I've just remembered 
that I once read a pretty reliable historically pro-Lancastrian 
novel – Heyer's My Lord John. But I couldn't finish it because it was 
almost impossible to get past all those "in sooth", "by troth" 
and "unbosom, Harry". 
a_svirn