Evil Overlords and their Groupies
Jim Ferer
jferer at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 24 18:13:47 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 24839
Pam:"It always bothers me a bit when I see the clearly psychopathic
or the antisocial referred to as insane. But psychopaths are *not*
insane by clinical or legal standards."
It's just that us laypeople don't have the precise use of the
vocabulary that professionals like you have. A lot of us are
using "insane" in the layman's sense of "this dude's not OK!" I
didn't know the term "successful" psychopath, but it made sense to me
right away and increased my understanding just by hearing it.
Pam:"The "good" ones are pretty much always charming and definitely
manipulative. Voldemort is a frightening character, in part because
he is not crazy. For him to be unhinged would detract from his power
to instill the creeps in me."
Definitely. Same with Lucius, and I agree that Voldemort is probably
less "successful", since his arrogance, self-absorption, and hatred
is leading him to gloat over Harry instead of just killing him.
Lucius wouldn't have hesitated a second, and then gone to dinner
without another thought.
Pam:"That was my problem with Barty, Jr. and why the whole Mad-Eye
thing proved to be ultimately disappointing to me. When JKR made him
unhinged, she (IMHO) undermined the masterful portrait she had
created of a supreme deceiver and manipulator, willing to do anything
to anybody--no matter how heinous--to achieve his ends; in the end, he
became just another nutty zealot."
This was JKR's best twist yet -- I never suspected a thing -- but the
denouement could have been better. I thought the "Mad, am I?" bit was
a little trite, and I agree that when he came unglued it wasn't
consistent with the deception he'd played all year. OTOH, it wasn't
the "Fallacy of the Talking Killer" thing again, because it was
believable that Barty would want to find out what Harry had seen.
You could also say the portrait JKR did give us was of how a psycho
like Voldemort attracts the mentally vulnerable.
Pam:"Big V and Lucius Malfoy (who may be a better psychopath than Big
V) have led me to wonder about JKR's conception of the nature of
evil and its appearance in everyday life. I know we've tackled that
thread before and we're kinda talking about it again with this whole
Evil Overlord thing."
If we can only discuss important points like this once, we ought to
unsub and let a new group have at it. Philosophers and theologians
have spent centuries at it and it's still not settled. Evil begins
when humans stop seeing the humanity in others. That's what allows
human beings to watch other human beings starve, or lets Voldemort
order 'kill the *spare*,' an entirely irrelevant meat sack.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive