Snape/Harry/Sirius Nov 1, 1981
moorequests
mollypickle at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 6 11:43:55 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 30952
Heather,
May I be first in saying,
You think too much. Especially for one posting at 1 AM.
Seriously, though, I'm loving it. What well thought out detail!! I'm
amazed. Keep it coming. I'll have to read your post through several
more times before I can even comment... you've done some major work
there. WOW!
-Molly
"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints, the
sinners are much more fun... only the good die young." -Billy Joel
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "heathernmoore" <heathernmoore at y...> wrote:
> I've been turning things over today:
>
> - Hagrid's withholding information about Snape from Harry
>
> - Dumbledore's utter lack over concern about Snape's loyalty, under
circumstances which many readers find a little odd
>
> - The sequence of events running during the ten days between Oct 23
and November 2, 1981, especially McGonagall's bizarre lack of
information and the Hagrid's equally bizarre disappearing baby trick
>
> - Snape's unprovoked, near-total irritation with Harry and his
utter lack of perspective regarding Sirius Black and Remus Lupin
>
> - Snape's apparent attitude adjustment between Harry's duel with LV
and his subtle encounter with Harry at the Leaving Feast
>
> -the mystical powers of Life Debts in the wizarding world
>
>
>
> I have a really OUT THERE theory about how it all might fit
together. I wish I could be more articulate about it, but I'll do my
best.
>
> We are fairly certain that Snape was the individual who tipped off
*someone* about Voldemort's intention to murder James and Harry
Potter.
>
> It is factual that this tip has to have made its way to the Potters
somewhat before October 24th. We can reasonably presume that the
Potters were *not* living at the Godric's Hollow house when the
tipoff came. Since James and Lily Potter appear to have been
something of a popular and promising young couple, using Fidelius on
the house where they already lived would
> have served little purpose; easy enough for any Death Eater to find
out who the Potters' friends were and lean on them to say where they
lived.
>
> One would surmise that a person would first need to have a Secret
in order to need to have a Secret-Keeper, and I can't picture
Fidelius actually operating as a Memory Charm for everyone on earth
except the Secret Keeper. So prior to Oct 24, when they worked the
charm with Peter, the Potters have to have left their home and fled
to the new house.
>
> Why was there a house available? Presumably furnished, no less? Was
this an unused home which had been left to them as a family legacy?
Again, it's not likely to have been the Potter Family Summer House;
there would likely have been records about it somewhere in the
Ministry or elsewhere.
>
> Was this one of the Evans family homes, then? Lily being Muggle-
born, its much more unlikely that any of the Death Eaters would have
known anything about any of her childhood houses prior to Peter's
revelation. The magic-related destruction of one of the Evans houses
> would have just driven Petunia over the edge.
>
> It is factual that Snape was not privy to the source of the leak
about the Potters' location in hiding, but we haven't actually been
given any strong reason to believe he was *ignorant* of the details
of the raid on Godric's Hollow once it came down.
>
> In addition to the two murders at the house - which might have gone
undetected - the raid *also* resulted rather bizarrely in the
destruction of the house itself (HOW???), in such a way that the
Muggle officials showed up later.
>
> But before the Muggles can arrive, first Hagrid, and then Sirius,
both turn up. Hagrid has to have been told by Dumbledore where to go.
Due to the last-minute nature of the SK Switch, Sirius may well have
been the one person outside of the charm who knew where the Potters
were. Hagrid might have Apperated in, but Sirius is of course on his
flying motorcycle. As we see with the flying Ford in CS, these
enchanted vehicles aren't bullet-train fast. Sirius must have taken a
little bit of time in getting there. (How he knew to come? Did Peter
draw Sirius out, intending to kill him later in the day?)
>
>
> The fact that they arrive too late to get the Potters away, but
before the Muggles arrive, suggests to me that someone in
Dumbledore's circle (probably D himself) received another, last-
minute warning from Snape, who was able to tell D(?) where (Godric's
Hollow!) and when (*tonight*). The tragic timing also suggests to me
that Snape may have done this in person and was genuinely unable to
get the word to the others in order to have support at the house when
it would have helped. Perhaps he didn't have the crucial detail until
LV had already left, and Snape had to find some privacy to Apperate
into Hogsmeade and then rush to castle.
>
> Snape being Snape, I'm sure once he was filled in, he placed the
blame for the weakness of the Fidelius Charm plan squarely on the
late James Potter's shoulders. Surely the plan was only intended as a
temporary measure?
>
> So everything is quiet when Hagrid arrives - presumably except for
the squalling of baby Harry, with an oozy cut on his forehead and the
house in shambles around him. How does Hagrid know that Voldemort is
gone? Surely it shouldn't be safe for him to turn up on his own if
they don't know exactly what he'll find? I'm guessing that Dumbledore
and the Potters (and godfather Sirius?) worked whatever protective
magic they had on Harry before the Potters went into hiding, so that
Dumbledore has a pretty solid idea what may have been the final
outcome should LV have found the Potters.
>
> Hagrid half-sorrowfully, half-bewilderedly does what he was asked
to do: he retrieves the baby and refuses to give him to Sirius. It
isn't clear that he has any idea *why* Sirius has to be snubbed like
this, but Hagrid is loyal to Dumbledore. Depressed and enraged by
Peter's betrayal and the deaths of his dear friends, blaming himself
to a degree, Sirius hands off his motorcycle (what would appear to be
a typical pre-suicide move) to Hagrid and sets off to settle the
score with Peter. He probably expects to die in the encounter.
Hagrid, of course, takes the baby and the motorcycle and flies off
to....
>
> .... Privet Drive? Nope. That's the following night. So where
*does* he go? To DisneyWorld? To bed? To the moon, Alice?
>
> I'm guessing to bed, back at his cottage at Hogwarts, dropping off
the baby somewhere that Dumbledore is first. Dumbledore apparently
instructs Hagrid to come back late the following evening to pick up
the baby and take him at midnight to Privet Drive in Little Whinging,
where Dumbledore will meet them again.
>
> Someone during the night gets the word out (likely to the MoM) that
Voldemort is gone. By morning, it seems as though all of Wizarding
Britain learns the news over their breakfast. They perhaps do not
have the rest of the yet, though, because when a Harry-less Hagrid
runs into McGonagall that morning, she doesn't know the details and
Hagrid doesn't tell her much. He also won't tell her where Dumbledore
is, but lets the Privet Drive location out, so off she scarpers.
>
> The next thing we know, it's midnight. Dumbledore gets to Privet
Drive and does his little put-outer schtick, McGonagall has her
little "yo, what the hell is going on" moment, and suddenly here
comes Hagrid the Hells Angel, once again with Harry in tow. Nobody
asks and nobody tells what has gone on all day -- much later we find
out about Sirius' being framed.
>
> Okay... now here is where I have a schizophrenic breakdown and get
to the point of all this:
>
> I think Snape's distaste for Harry springs from the mysterious 23-
hour period when Dumbledore had Harry in his possession on November
1st. I think the Potters, Sirius, and Dumbledore had had between them
a contingency plan for Harry in the event of the Potters' deaths.
Considering the coercive power life debts seems to have in the
Wizarding World, I suspect there's much more to the relationship
between godparent and godchild than meets the eye.
>
> The Potters and Sirius, being relative youngsters (they're all only
21) and undoubtedly scared almost witless by the idea of Voldemort
targeting them, screwed the pooch with their Fidelius Charm plan.
With their substitution of Peter for Sirius, not only were they
putting their Secret into very weak hands, they were gambling against
making Sirius unable to participate in a binding charm with Harry
should they be killed.
>
> It was a gamble they lost: Sirius lost the trust of everyone - even
Remus Lupin - and most importantly of Dumbledore. In his anger, he
raced off to find Peter instead of attempting to explain his
innocence to anyone.
>
> Again, as above, I think the timing of the raid and of Dumbledore's
response is consistent with Snape having come personally to
Dumbledore. Probably unknown to Hagrid, perhaps Dumbledore struck a
bargain with the penitent Snape: with Sirius out of the picture,
Snape could make amends for his Death Eater activity and his untimely
warning of LV's raid by stepping in as Harry's protector/"godparent"
in a binding charm.
>
> Being skeptical about all that prophecy rubbish and not inclined to
be fond of this squirmy little Pottergrub, Snape's gut response is
sure to have been, "ICK!" But he knows that he's in danger of ending
up in Azkaban, however useful he might have seemed as a spy while LV
was still around. And now here is Dumbledore offering him this
position of trust and responsibility, in spite of every malicious
thing he has done when he was under the Dark influence.
>
> Not only is he being shown respect and given protection and a
purpose by Dumbledore, but it's in the face of and in preference to
that damnable Sirius Black. If Snape finds binding his protection to
the son of James Potter a little burdensome, at least he knows that
the prophecy is all hogwash, and naturally as Dumbledore says, it
isn't as though Snape has to raise the kid. Dumbledore intends to put
him with relatives where he will be safe until he can attend school,
where he'll be far away from the inevitable fame.
>
> And so Snape agrees to the arrangement. Over the next few hours,
Snape and Dumbledore prepare and perform a ritual which creates a
sort of mutual Super Life Debt between Severus and Harry. , In the
morning, soon after being so evasive with McGonagall and being
certain she has left, Hagrid comes to get Harry and put him down for
a nap for an hour or two before setting off on Sirius' flying
motorcycle for Surrey.
>
> I'm not going to speculate much on how the binding protection
enchantment thingie works, but I'm thinking there's some Big Mojo
magical obligation on Snape's part to protect Harry against dark
magical threats in life.
>
> And it's really not that big a deal for the first several years.
Snape just puts it out of mind; after the ordeal of the trials and
with his increasing responsibilities at the school, his Harry Potter
albatross seems such a minor thing.
>
> Then the DADA professors start going haywire: something's weird
about Quirrell even before he runs off to Albania. People start
talking about Voldemort again, and the possibility that he isn't
really dead. Dumbledore is concerned enough that he and the staff
start planning for bringing the Philosopher's Stone to Hogwarts. Dour
Severus finally has to admit to himself that Potter will be at school
soon; the kids are all over "Harry this" and "Harry that"
and "Professor Snape, do you think Harry Potter will be good at
potions?" "Professor Snape, don't you think Harry Potter will be Head
Boy?"
> And the children of the other Death Eaters have started turning up
at Hogwarts already. And and and...
>
> And then the albatross is at school, and it becomes absolutely
clear to Severus that:
>
> a) Harry Potter is a detestable little brat just like his father
who got himself and his wife and nearly his son *killed,*
>
> and
>
> b) It doesn't matter whether the prophecy is objectively accurate:
Voldemort is after Harry again, Severus is magically bound to help
protect him.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive