Musings About the Regulation of Potions
cindysphynx
cindysphynx at home.com
Fri Dec 21 23:29:38 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 32065
Now that we've had an entire major plot twist rest on the use of a
potion (polyjuice potion in GoF), I started wondering why it isn't
regulated by MoM. We're told that love potions are banned at
Hogwarts, and that Veritaserum is strictly regulated by MoM.
Polyjuice potion allows identity theft, and I can't think of any
legitimate use for it except perhaps official uses such as spying and
law enforcement. Nevertheless, it appears that anyone is permitted
to brew it up, even kids.
In fact, I'm kind of surprised that so many potions are treated
rather casually. There are several that do things that a person
would be unlikely to use on themselves. These include Confusing
Concoction, Draught of the Living Death (powerful sleeping potion),
Forgetfulness Potion, maybe HairRaising Potion.
If a potion is primarily useful for working some sort of unwelcome
magic to the detriment of another person, shouldn't it be regulated
and controlled? After all, the Imperius Curse, which causes someone
to do something they otherwise wouldn't do, is an Unforgiveable Curse
punishable by a life sentence in Azkaban. Yet using polyjuice potion
and impersonating someone so that they appear to be doing things they
otherwise wouldn't do is fine and dandy.
I wonder what, if anything, this says about wizarding society.
Cindy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive