Coke again
Amy Z
aiz24 at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 21 01:11:08 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 12705
Amanda wrote:
> "The campaign also will abandon common promotional gimmicks for
movies
> geared to children, such as sweepstakes and giveaways through
fast-food
> chains. Instead, literacy will be stressed."
Well...I feel somewhat better, but I think you're being too easy on
Coke and WB. The tie-in itself is a promotional gimmick intended to
sell, not literacy, but Coca-Cola to children. I'm glad they're not
going to bribe kids with figurines, but the basic fact is that they
are using kids' love of HP to get them to buy their product. A
product I happen to love to drink, but this ain't a public service.
> I mean, SOME
> corporate entity almost has to back something this expensive, and at
> least they're making a stab at doing it well.
Why does any corporate entity besides TimeWarnerAOL have to back it?
The making of the movie (and any associated advertising which is what
a tie-in is) isn't a nonprofit undertaking; it's an investment of
millions by a company in a product (HP movies) that's bound to make
them many, many millions more in profits.
Still gnashing my teeth and rending my hair, albeit more quietly,
Amy Z
--------------------------------------------------
The Whomping Willow was a very violent tree that
stood alone in the middle of the grounds.
-HP and the Prisoner of Azkaban
--------------------------------------------------
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive