Worst-Case Casting, wasRe: Could the Movie be this bad?

[milz]

No: HPFGUIDX 9192

Scott wrote:
> "Oh, no. Disney'd cast it like this;
> 
> "-Weasley twins; Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen (did I mention that in 
>  this version the twins are in the same year as Harry? And aren't 
>  related to Ron? Oh, yeah, they're girls, too)"
> 
> Has anyone seen the movie "Double Bubble Toil and Trouble"? (Or 
> something like that.) It features the Olsen twins and usually comes 
> on around Halloween (btw, can anyone tell me why the British ed. 
puts 
> an appostrophy in the word- Hallowe'en?).  In it the twins try to 
> retrieve a moonstone (which has magic powers) from their evil witch 
> aunt so that they can save their other aunt who is trapped in a 
> mirror. (They'd fit right in to PS/SS (I'm kidding).)
> 
> I really don't have much against Disney. This however is not to say 
> that I wish they were making the movie- I don't. 
>  
> Scott
> Hmmm, you forgot to mention that Cinderella's castle would be 
> trasformed into Hogwarts ala the Magic Kingdom.

MTV would cast it like this:

Harry, Ron, Neville, Seamus, Dean = The Back Street boys
Percy, Bill, Charlie, Fred and George Weasley= N Sync
Hermione = Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera 
Dumbledore = Mick Jagger
Sirius or Snape = Steven Tyler (Aerosmith)
Uncle Vernon = Ozzy Osbourne
Lockhart = Sting
Nearly Headless Nick= David Bowie

Madonna would be cast as Molly, McGonagall or Madame Hooch.
Hogwarts would look like something out of Marilyn Manson's 
imagination.