[HPforGrownups] Dumbledore-Fudge confrontation in GoF
Calypso8604 at aol.com
Calypso8604 at aol.com
Sun Nov 11 13:02:13 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 29056
For you first paragraph/question, the keyword is "RESPONSIBLE". Fusge didn't
say he killed several people, only that he was responsible for several
deaths. Which he was.
It is very possible Fudge is a bad guy though I doubt that he killed anyone
himself. Perhaps, if he *IS* evil, he just uses his powers as Minister to
help Voldemort out. Or a theory I like better is that Fudge is not on the
Dark Side....yet.
~ Calypso
In a message dated 11/10/01 10:51:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
sherratt at mediaone.net writes:
> I was discussing with a friend a little spot in GoF that's bothered me
> since I first read it. During the confrontation in the infirmary,
> Fudge is defending himself for having turned a Dementor on Barty
> Crouch Jr., and says "It seems he has been responsible for several
> deaths!" Then Dumbledore retorts that now Crouch "cannot give
> evidence about why he killed those people," and Fudge goes on
> blustering about how it's because he was a raving lunatic. But this
> doesn't make sense to me. In fact, Crouch is NOT responsible for
> "several deaths" - he wasn't even present when Cedric was killed. The
> only person he personally killed was his father. And Fudge wasn't
> present at the interrogation, so he couldn't even know that. So what
> is he talking about? I can see him supposing that Crouch could be
> responsible for Cedric's death, without knowing the details, but how
> does this translate into "several"?
>
> And the way Dumbledore is staring at Fudge during this conversation
> makes me wonder if perhaps this is a trap of some kind. Like one of
> those Agatha Christie novels, where a suspect reveals something that
> only the killer could know. Is he realizing something about Fudge
> here - does Fudge know something that he couldn't know unless he was
> on Voldemort's side? Dumbledore's remark that Crouch can't give
> evidence about why he killed those people doesn't make sense, either -
> Crouch already has given evidence under Veritaserum, and Dumbledore
> knows everything about the deaths of Cedric and Crouch Sr. Now, maybe
> he doesn't want to admit this to Fudge, or maybe he just wants to see
> what Fudge will say in response. Anyway, I have a bad feeling about
> Fudge. Any ideas about this?
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive