Why Voldemort doesn't challenge Dumbledore?
Cindy C.
cynthiaanncoe at home.com
Tue Nov 13 23:12:31 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 29191
Megan wrote:
> However, this does leave off a shaky explanation of why Voldemort
> didn't "need" to kill Lily. We know she is a powerful witch, as she
> was Head Girl (obvious excellent at magic). This COULD be explained
> by perhaps Voldemort was killing James/Harry to gain a SPECIFIC
power
> that is traditionall genetic? Or maybe to stop the line of this
> genetic power.
>
> Good job, Milz! Does anyone spy any holes with this theory?
>
I don't see any holes, but I can give a potentially provocative
answer to why Voldemort did not need to kill Lily. Perhaps one only
obtains a boost to one's power by killing men, not women. Perhaps a
woman's power cannot be taken. Instead, women give their power
and "protection" voluntarily, the way Lily gave her protection to
Harry. So maybe Voldemort did not get stronger by killing Lily (or
Bertha Jorkins).
Hey, it's a theory.
Cindy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive