Why Voldemort doesn't challenge Dumbledore?

[bookraptor11 at yahoo.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 29201

> <Milz wrote>
> > 
> > What if the AK Curse not only kills the victim, but also 
transfers the 
> > victim's powers to the curser? If it does, then that would 
explain 
> > why Voldemort went around killing powerful wizards and witches 
(per 
> > Hagrid). 

Add me to those who think this is a great theory.  It also made me 
wonder, in GOF then, when Harry's wand draws Cedric, Bertha, his 
parents out of V's wand, does that symbolize that Voldemort has now 
lost the powers these people gave him?


--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Megan" <virtualworldofhp at y...> adds:
 
> I really, really like this theory because it solves several 
dilemmas. *snips out four*
> 2. Why Aurors were not previously granted rights to kill (apart from
> morality issues)--before so they would not kill in order to gain 
more
> powers; greed.

> genetic power.

There should be a way for Aurors (and wizards in general) to kill 
without using the AK curse. Sometimes killing might be necessary in 
self defense, but if they use the AK aren't they automatically 
thought to have crossed a line into dark wizardry?

Shouldn't have snipped your first dilemma, since I wanted to add that 
it really solves the problem of how Harry can be a parseltongue 
without being the heir to Slytherin.  

Donna