Bexis >>> Ron's first wand

[s_luhtanen at hotmail.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 29299

--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Beck, Jim" <beckj at p...> wrote:
> "if in a duel it was one of the order and not Voldermort who's wand 
was
> forced, then this would put the person at a distinct disadvantage."

No - even if they lost that wand - they'd still have the Wand-not-from 
Fawkes they had before, the one that chose them, right? Only Harry - 
who was chosen by that kind of wand, would be in sever disadvantage - 
unless he, too, had several wands.
  
> How so Erie?  That would mean that the order member was getting the 
worst of
> any particular duel with V, but that is effect, not cause.  Assuming 
that
> order members do not go around murdering people, I'm not sure that 
priori
> incantum would result in anything coming out of their wands that 
they would
> have to be afraid of.

Priori incantum - hmm... Harry desperately forced the 'pearls' back to 
Voldemort's wand - supported by Fawkes' song. The OoP would find 
Fawkes encouraging, right?
  
> The advantage, of course, would be the ability to stop or greatly 
slow down
> V's spells, particularly the AK curse -- until the order could call 
in
> reinforcements.

Even more - Get Voldemort stuck into the Priori incantum with one 
wand and then stun him with other or something like that... But 
anyway, it is a great advantage. Or - break Voldy's wand with a 
sword....