Dorms/Differences in house size
magpie1112 at yahoo.com
magpie1112 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 13 19:39:57 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 26075
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., borg3892000 at y... wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Sofie " <sofie_elisabeth at y...> wrote:
> > --- In HPforGrownups at y..., Vicky DeGroote <degroote at a...> wrote:
> > > I meant to type 1000 students at Hogwarts, not 100. I've read
al
> > ot of this about how many students, but maybe didn't get far
enough
> > to read abou the dorms.
> > >
> > > Oops-sorry
> > > Kitty
> > >
> > Personally I prefer Angie J's theory thta Harry's year is small
> > due to the war. People of child-bearing age were fighting and a
> > lot of them were probably killed. That leaves less people to have
> > children and so then you get less children (from magical families
> > anyway).
>
> I've been wondering about this for a while, myself.
>
> In reading COS again, (for the umpteenth time), it hit me that
> perhaps the houses aren't the same size.
Brilliant idea, Borg! I too assumed that the houses were all the
same size. That could also explain the reason why Griffindor &
Slytherin are placed in classes together. I can't remember if I've
ever seen a Ravenclaw or a Hufflepuff sharing a class, either with
Griffindors or Slytherins. If the bulk of Hogwarts is made up of R's
& H's, it would certainly "puff" up the numbers.
And I wouldn't discount the "war = fewer children" theory, either.
If that is the case, I wonder if there was a "wizard boom" a year or
so after the war? Perhaps Ginny's class (and the next few classes
after) are larger?
- Denise (who was never very good with numbers, anyway)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive