Voldemort and wandless magic
blpurdom
blpurdom at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 25 21:57:17 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 38178
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "marinafrants" <rusalka at i...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., Edblanning at a... wrote:
> > When Harry and Quirrell confront each other, Quirrell binds Harry
> > magically, apparently without recourse to a wand.
> > We know that Dumbledore can perform wandless magic.
> > But Voldemort, *Voldemort*, the most powerful dark wizard of
> > modern times, apparently needs a wand. Why?
>
> I think that wandless magic (useful and controlled wandless magic, I
> mean, not the chaos random stuff Harry has done by accident) may be
> a matter of not just power, but also mental focus and self-control
> -- qualities Voldemort is a bit low on. This does raise the
> question of how Quirrel could do it, but I tend to lean toward the
> theory that Quirrel was actually a talented wizard and DADA
> instructor before Voldemort got to him.
I got the impression when reading the first book that Quirrell was
being possessed by Voldemort and was therefore channeling Voldemort's
power, such as it was. Since he still had his own power, this would
mean his magic would be very potent indeed. (After all, Quirrell
couldn't touch Harry without feeling pain, although it was Voldemort
who had tried to curse Harry in 1981.) It's not that Voldemort needs
a wand to do magic, per se--the point is he needs a BODY, which he
doesn't have yet. That's why it's so important for him to get his
body back.
Other people use wandless magic, most notably Dumbledore (although
even old Tom lights fires with a snap of his fingers at the Leaky
Cauldron and Remus Lupin conjures instant illumination on the
Hogwarts Express). I believe the body is the first way in which
magical humans express their magic, and wands just help focus it even
more. Ghosts, for instance, don't seem to retain the ability to do
magic even when they were witches and wizards in life. The Fat Friar
was supposed to have been a Hufflepuff when he was in school and he
is no longer able to do magic after death; ditto the ghost of Myrtle.
I think Quirrell could probably have conjured the ropes whether or
not he was being controlled by Voldemort, but my point is that I
think he did it BECAUSE he was being controlled by Voldemort, and it
was Voldemort's will and power that accomplished this.
--Barb
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HP_Psych
http://www.schnoogle.com/authorLinks/Barb
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive