Ancient Magic
grey_wolf_c
greywolf1 at jazzfree.com
Thu Aug 8 14:59:33 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 42302
> Tara First Comment:
>
> > First of all, I really enjoy the idea of Lily using ancient magic
> with the help of Dumbledore to protect Harry "just in case". And I
> feel it only makes sense that she had to sacrafice her own life in
> order for the spell to work. Especially since Ollivander pointed out
> in SS that her wand was excellent for *charms*. Seems like JKR was
> giving a little hint right there, IMO.
> >
>
> BBOY_MN Responds:
> Why does it need to be anything more that the pure power of the pure
> essense of love? Isn't the power of a selfless act of love enough to
> give Harry the protection he needs? You have to admit that love is
> powerful force; people live for it, they die for it, they kill for
> it, kings and queens give up the throne for love, people are healed
> by love, spirits are renewed, tormented souls are made whole again.
> If you are of Christian belief, then the sins of the entire world for
> all time were redeemed by a single selfless act of love. You're more
> than welcome to your theory, but as far as I'm concerned, to be
> marked by such pure powerful selfless love if more than enough power
> to save Harry.
Why does it have to be "just love" as you put it? Nothing in canon
points towards it, and there is no way to explain why, if the love
shield is as simple as love, isn't it extremely common. I'd say that
people *have* loved their children before. You won't accept a spell,
even when the whole books are built around the spells, but you give no
reasons execpt metathinking "nah, it's not literary enbough". In
potterverse, even modern spells require no words or even wand (check
Snape creating ropes to bind Lupin in the shack, or Dumbledore's magic
tricks), but in this situation you keep insisting it's just love. You
even mention a good number of examples, but none of them created an
impenetrable love shield in the recipient.
On the other hand, I've given enough examples of canon that point
towards an ancient spell -not an *elemental* force of magic, or *simple
love*. Voldemort describes the shield as "the mark of the sacrifice
...this is *ancient magic*" (my emphasis). He does not speak of love,
since he wouldn't understand it, but he *does* speak of magic, and he's
an expert on magic.
On the same line, he identifies the ancient magic used by Dumbledore to
protect Harry at the Dursley's as "invoked", indicating that ancient
magic requires invocation, and thus it's controlled by a spell. It does
*not* give any hint of being a primal force channeled through love or
any other sentiment.
Dumbledore does *not* speak of the love shield in the first book. He
explains how the combined Quirrellmort could not touch him, but he does
not tell Harry how he survived the AK. We are told at that point that
what *burns* Quirrellmort is the love of Lily for Harry, but Dumbledore
tiptoes around how that love got to permeate Harry. He does mention
that lily "died to save [Harry]", which gives weight to the *sacrifice
is a important part of the love shield* idea, though. Then too, in GoF
Dumbledore describes that when Voldemort took Harry's blood he had
"surpassed that barrier", which indeed tells us that the love shield is
in his blood.
I admit that the clues are not very clear, since Dumbledore won't speak
about the fateful night, and Voldemort will ignore the part love played
in the protection, but I think we've got more than enough proof that
ancient magic is, infact, invoked (i.e. it's "spelled" or requires some
sort of ritual), while there is no mention whatsoever of primal forces
tied with that magic. I'll agree that it's the love in the love shield
that burnt Quirrellmort, but that love cannot be simply the result of
having loving parents, or Voldemort wouldn't be able to touch a single
person. And what is more, if that protection was present in almost
every wizard, Voldemort would not have aimed Harry exclusively but, as
Peter suggested, any witch or wizard would have served equally.
Hope that helps,
Grey Wolf
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive