Could Quidditch really work?
Ali
Ali at zymurgy.org
Thu Dec 5 22:48:24 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 47806
Quidditch puzzles me. IIRC, JKR said that she had invented Quidditch
because all societies have sport as a focal point. But, as much as I
like reading about Harry's Quidditch obsession and indeed the humour
shown in QTTA, I have trouble believing that Quidditch would actually
work. This is not because my feet are firmly on the ground, but the
nature of some of the rules.
Quidditch seems to me to be 2 games in one the seekers catching the
snitch and the rest of the team playing a more conventional "put ball
in goal and score points" game. My understanding of Quidditch is that
the Seeker is normally responsible for winning the game; Ireland
winning the game although Bulgaria's Krum caught the Snitch struck me
as unusual. What then is the point of the rest of the game? Firstly,
I would argue entertainment and a chance to see different strategies
and talents shown on broomsticks. But the real importance to the
fans, and indeed to the cohesiveness of the game, must be in the way
in which the league tables are drawn up.
The English Football League (soccer) works as follows:
a winning team gains 3 points for winning a match and 1 for a draw,
but, when 2 or more teams have the same number of points, the team
which scored the most goals, and had the fewest goals against them,
is the one which is higher up the League.
Does Hogwart's Quidditch cup work in a similar fashion? Does the
professional Quidditch league work along similar lines?
We know that points are significant to the Hogwarts Quidditch cup as
Harry has to wait until Gryffindor are a number of points ahead
before catching the Golden Snitch in Gryffindor's 3rd match in PoA.
Winning the match would not have won Gryffindor the cup. Is it good
then for Harry to try and catch the snitch early on? (Except for when
he needs a win to stop Snape favouring Hufflepuff). I would think
that it is not, unless he is playing for the weaker side. It would be
more advantageous to stop the other seeker catching the snitch and
let his side win more points. Of course, in professional Quidditch,
an early snitch catch would be bad entertainment value. Rather like a
boxer being knocked out in the first round. It may sound sensational,
but effectively the spectators have been deprived of entertainment.
I have many more questions relating to Quidditch that I will be
asking, but at this point I really want to know: could Quidditch
actually work?
Ali
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive