So Why didn't Dumbledore Punish Sirius?
pippin_999 <foxmoth@qnet.com>
foxmoth at qnet.com
Fri Dec 13 21:05:48 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 48289
> Angela said:
>
> > > I am a Sirius-supporter to the end. I'm glad that he was not
> > punished for the prank, but I do not understand WHY he got
away
> > with it? Maybe he didn't. Maybe he was punished, but the
> > punishment for something like that would probably be
expulsion.
> > <<
> >
> Pippin [moi] replied:
>
> > We don't know if Sirius admitted to anything except telling
Snape how to get into the Willow.
Monika:
>
> I always understood from what Lupin was saying in PoA that
Sirius apparently didn't do anything else. It was up to Snape to
use thisinformation like he did. Don't get me wrong, I don't think
Sirius should have told him how to get into the Willow, but it's not
like he dragged him there.<<
I see I've expressed myself with my usual lack of clarity. Let me
try again. My [hypothetical] sequence of events goes like this.
Lupin tells his friends including Sirius all kinds of stories about
why he is absent
Sirius, James and Peter eventually learn the truth
Snape spots Lupin entering the Willow with Madame Pomfrey.
The Marauders discover what Snape has seen
The Marauders fear Snape's spying will uncover more of their
secrets and they will be expelled.
One [or more] of the Marauders, including Sirius, plan[s] the
prank.
Sirius tells Snape how to get into the Willow.
Snape enters the Willow and sees Lupin transformed
James learns and/or gets cold feet about the Prank
James saves Snape
[Dumbledore questions Snape, James and Sirius about the
incident, and later, Lupin]
Both James and Snape can testify that Sirius told Snape how to
enter the Willow
Snape is warned never to reveal Lupin's secret
Snape accuses James, Lupin and Sirius of conspiring to kill
him.
Snape cannot prove that Sirius knew what was in the tunnel.
Dumbledore's investigation wouldn't turn up the fact that Sirius
knew Lupin was a werewolf unless one of the Marauders told
him. Which I rather believe they did not. Dumbledore couldn't very
well ask Sirius whether he knew Lupin was a werewolf or knew
that there was a monster down the passage without giving the
secret away himself.
********
Dumbledore: Tell me why you did this.
Sirius: (to Dumbledore's knees) James told me the passage
was a secret way out of the school. I, er, thought Snape would
get caught out of bounds and get in trouble. (Shades of Draco in
book one)
Dumbledore: And where was Mr. Lupin was at the time?
Sirius: He, er, told me he has to go to help his mother. She's sick
and they've got a mooncalf farm, and you know, he thought it
would be embarrassing if anyone found out that he was
spending every full moon shoveling sh-- (FBAWTFT)
Dumbledore: (quickly) That will do, Mr. Black. Is there anything
else you wish to tell me?
Sirius: No, Headmaster
******
Monika:
As for not getting any punishment (which I doubt),
> I explained in a message I sent last week why they weren't all
> expelled IMO. Dumbledore did it to ensure Lupin could stay at
Hogwartsand finish his education. And I still think he didn't take it
forattempted murder.
>
> Think of the scene in PoA when Malfoy and his friends try to
frighten Harry to death by playing Dementors during the
Quidditch match. That could have very well killed him if
Dumbledore hadn't slowed his fall.<<
You're confusing two incidents. The fall came from the *real*
Dementors during the previous match. Draco couldn't have
possibly caused Harry to go into a trance and fall off his broom.
The worst that could have happened was that Harry would have
been distracted and Ravenclaw would have gotten the Snitch.
> Where they expelled? No. If I remember well, they only got
detention,and Slytherin lost 50 house points. Was this attempted
murder? I don't
> think so, either. It was a very immature schoolboy prank (a bit
like telling Snape how to get into the Willow), but it doesn't prove
that Malfoy is capable of murder at the age of thirteen, to
paraphrase what Snape said to Dumbledore at the end of PoA.
<<
Well, risking a salvo from the Draco Apologists, Draco would
*like* to be thought capable of murder. We overhear him wishing
he could help the Heir of Slytherin and hoping that Granger will
die.
However, even in the Wizarding World, merely wishing that
someone would die is not a crime. Assuming the punishments
at Hogwarts usually fit the crime, if not the guilty party, we can
see a spectrum of punishments.
Whoever deliberately set Slytherin's monster loose to kill people
would be in Azkaban. The incident would be kept quiet. (Draco's
statement to Ron and Harry in CoS. )
Hagrid, accused of keeping a dangerous monster which
accidentally kills a student, is expelled from school but not sent
to Azkaban. The incident was kept quiet.
Draco, pretending to be a dangerous monster, is given detention
and loses house points.
Draco wishes Granger would die. No punishment, not even one
of JKR's karmic specials.
I think Dumbledore would have been confident that he could
keep things quiet, even if he had to expel somebody. And I think
he would have done that, at least, if he could have proved that
Sirius knew what Lupin was and deliberately planned for Snape
to encounter him.
Me:
> > The realization that Sirius had indeed known about Lupin all
> > along would give an additional reason for Snape to lose it in
the Shack and add some extra fire to Snape's "You haven't
forgotten"
> > speech in the Hospital Wing.
Monika:
> I think Snape must have known all along that Sirius knew
about Lupin, or him suspecting Lupin to be in on the joke doesn't
make a whole lot of sense to me. Why should Sirius tell him
where to go if he didn'tknow what was waiting for him there?
My idea is that Snape *believed* that Sirius knew about Lupin,
but couldn't prove it, and when he finally heard that Sirius admit
that, yes, he did know about Lupin, Snape was illogically
confirmed in his belief Lupin knowing about the prank.
Interestingly, with Crookshanks there to spot lying, Lupin never
denies having been involved.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive