Fudge is Way Evil and I have the acronyms to prove it

[pippin_999]

No: HPFGUIDX 35765

::waves away clouds of pipe smoke, opens a window and lets 
the fresh air in::

Okay, there's a possibility Fudge could be evil. Dumbledore 
seems to be weighing that when he takes his hard look at 
Fudge. But I don't think Dumbledore buys it, because he doesn't 
adopt the needling tone he uses with Lucius Malfoy at the end of 
CoS. Also, if Fudge were a DE, wouldn't he leap at the chance to 
send envoys to the Giants, and agree at once to remove the 
Dementors from Azkaban? I imagine Lucius Malfoy will be 
downright annoyed when he finds out that he's lost a perfectly 
good opportunity to insinuate his own operatives into the Giant 
mission, or insert them into Azkaban. Hmmm, more of 
Dumbledore's Malfoy baiting? 

Also, making Fudge evil guts the meaning from Dumbledore's 
speech at the end of GoF. If Fudge is evil, then whom do we have 
who has chosen what was easy rather than what was right?   
Not Karkaroff or Bagman, who are simply fleeing for their lives. 
That's not a brave choice, but it can't have been  an easy one. 

Pippin
F.U.D.G.E.F.A.C.T.O.R.

> Dicentra replies:
> 
> Yes, yes, you've got an acronym in your support. But I've got 
FIVE!!! 
> 
> I win.

"One man and the truth is a majority"-anonymous :-)
PS This Sunday's New York Times Magazine had a column on 
Acronymania