polyjuice potion (was: Moody was really Crouch, Jr.)
uilnslcoap
devin.smither at yale.edu
Fri Jan 25 17:29:47 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 34053
Rachel wrote:
>I couldn't agree more! We do not know the real moody yet. We know
> Barty Crouch Jnr's estimation of moody and that is all.
Hey everyone, first-time writer. Let me start by saying I'm glad to
have found a forum for the thoughts running around like caged animals
in my head, and thanks to the people who started this wonderful board.
Now, I have to disagree with the argument that we know precious
little about the real Moody. I think we know a great deal about him,
though we may be slightly off on a few issues. If we take Crouch
Jr.'s performance as Moody, up until after the third task/Harry and
Voldemort's encounter, as excellent, then we are clued in greatly to
what Moody is like.
The question is, why take his performance as excellent? It's
obvious. DUMBLEDORE, he who sees all (practically), knows all (just
about), and fears nothing (almost), probably one of the most
difficult people in the world to hoodwink, was fooled by Crouch Jr.
Crouch tripped at the goal line and gave the game away when he took
Harry off the field, but up until then, he had been fooling people
who had had (yes, "had had" is correct) contact with Moody for
years. Therefore, he was giving a great impression of what the real
Moody's actions would be like in the situations he was thrown into.
One could counter that Crouch probably did not have much personal
contact with Dumbledore, et al., during the school year, but I think
that's unlikely. Staff meetings, the occasional Dumbledore interview
to discuss the current goings-on on the Dark Side (Where is
Voldemort? Where is Pettigrew? What do we know about the current
activities of the Death Eaters?), and other such encounters probably
gave Crouch plenty of opportunity to give himself away. Yet, he did
not, and so he must have been doing the best imaginable Moody
impression. One might be able to argue that Crouch's actions as
Moody when he was alone with Harry might not have been in-line, but
his actions and words in class (teaching students about pretty
dangerous magic), and in public (turning Draco into a ferret) were
probably completely lined up with what the real Moody's would have
been. Therefore, I think we have at least a decent idea of what
Moody is like.
I agree with certain people on this board who dislike Moody's
character (or at least his devil-may-care attitude with civil
liberties and the rights of the condemned). Both his actions in the
past (the Pensieve) and Crouch Jr.'s actions, which we can take to be
pretty Moody-like, send a shiver up my spine. Such a person may
forsake one person's justice when he views the ultimate goal worthy
of such an action, and that is reprehensible. Still, we haven't
REALLY seen him, so I may open my mind when he shows up in future
books.
Before I leave off on this topic, even though I know it's probably
been addressed somewhere before, I cannot for the life of me
understand why Crouch as Moody would teach Harry how to break the
Imperius Curse (or at least give him opportunities to learn how since
it seems to be a possibly un-learnable skill, more something one
empirically has as a gift). Or at least, having done so, why he
wouldn't let Voldemort know that Harry could break the curse. Could
someone reference where this has been discussed or start talking
about it?
Thanks everybody. See you later.
Devin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive