[HPforGrownups] Re: YES! The Great Alchemist Debate Solved (sort of)
Katze
jdumas at kingwoodcable.com
Tue Jul 9 22:58:10 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 40985
Amanda Geist wrote:
> A couple points on this thread:
>
> 1. Not every prominent/historical witch or wizard necessarily made it onto a
> card. It's probably up to the makers of Chocolate Frogs, and the ones *they*
> think are prominent. Maybe they personally never really heard of Flamel.
> Which leads me to
>
> 2. If Flamel isn't on a card, he could still be a wizard and Ron could
> legitimately not know about him. How many 11-year-old Muggle kids know who
> Marie Curie was, or what she did?
The appropriate question would be: How many 11-year old Muggles kids _who
collect trading cards of those who made strives in medicine_ know who Marie
Curie is, or what she did?
See - here's the problem with this argument - this asumes that all children are
collecting these cards, while in reality many children probably aren't. Ron is
collecting all the wizard cards - he even says (in SS/PS), "I've got about five
hundred, but I haven't got Agrippa or Ptolemy." I get the impression from this
that Ron keeps up with the cards, and is trying to collect them all.
I find it hard to believe that a wizard who has worked with Dumbledore in
Alchemy would not be known in the wizarding world. Unless of course he wasn't
accomplished at all, which wouldn't explain why he went down in the muggle
History books.
Katze
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive