Dumbledore does not HAVE to die.

barefootpuppets heidi at barefootpuppets.com
Wed Jun 5 12:19:10 UTC 2002


No: HPFGUIDX 39416


> Marcus (who isn't saying that Dumbledore won't die, just that he 
> doesn't have to.)

Well, "have to" is pretty strong.  Nothing "has to" happen unless JKR 
makes it so.  But you must admit that there was a lot of 
foreshadowing of Dumbledore looking older than ever in GoF.  And 
Dumbledore spoke of death in Book 1 as the "next adventure."

But I would argue that Dumbledore does need to go. Just like Obi Wan 
had to go.  It's the only way for Harry to meet his *destiny* -- 
whatever the heck that is!

Maybe not die, but at least be unavailable.  (re: Gandalf)

I believe that the foreshadowing in GoF is indicative of Dumbledore's 
death.  (I should look up all the instances, it's more than just one!)
 
Heidi R.






More information about the HPforGrownups archive