Dumbledore does not HAVE to die.
barefootpuppets
heidi at barefootpuppets.com
Wed Jun 5 12:19:10 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39416
> Marcus (who isn't saying that Dumbledore won't die, just that he
> doesn't have to.)
Well, "have to" is pretty strong. Nothing "has to" happen unless JKR
makes it so. But you must admit that there was a lot of
foreshadowing of Dumbledore looking older than ever in GoF. And
Dumbledore spoke of death in Book 1 as the "next adventure."
But I would argue that Dumbledore does need to go. Just like Obi Wan
had to go. It's the only way for Harry to meet his *destiny* --
whatever the heck that is!
Maybe not die, but at least be unavailable. (re: Gandalf)
I believe that the foreshadowing in GoF is indicative of Dumbledore's
death. (I should look up all the instances, it's more than just one!)
Heidi R.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive