The Spying Game and the Shrieking Shack (VERY LONG)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Jun 11 14:53:11 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39697
I find it hard to argue with a post that posits competent!Snape
and acknowledges the possibility of evil!Lupin. However, I
disagree with the central and unspoken premise that the
situation at the beginning of PoA is identical to the situation
during the Voldemort years and post-GoF.
Voldemort is in exile at the beginning of PoA, far more thoroughly
isolated, weakened and disgraced than Napoleon on St. Helena.
Even his erstwhile followers have no more use for him. It is very
unlike the terrorist war you referred to in your post, where even
jailed leaders still wielded considerable power and influence
from their cells, and it might make sense to plant a weakened
lieutenant in their midst.
Even if Dumbledore regarded Voldemort's reembodiment as
ineviteable, and there is no indication of that, I find it hard to
believe that he and Snape would conspire to bring it about. The
fact that Voldemort used Harry's blood offers a gleam of hope but
no more. It's clear that Dumbledore regards Voldemort's return
as a catastrophe for the entire wizarding world. It's not
something he wanted to have happen.
I also don't like the idea of Harry as a puppet in the shack,
manipulated into doing whatever Dumbledore and Snape have
in mind. It undermines the theme of choices.
Eleven year old Harry's belief that Dumbledore knows more or
less everything is, IMO, as much hero-worship as anything else.
In each book we see Dumbledore exercising less and less
control over events. To have Snape micromanaging the end of
PoA in the fashion you suggest would not be in keeping with the
pattern.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive