Evil Lupin/McGonagall
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Sun Jun 16 02:50:48 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39918
Random Monkey wrote:
> On Evil!Lupin, David_Burnett:
> > For sheer practicality, I'm not sure JKR turns someone that
popular
> > bad. It's simply not good business. :)
>
> Have you ever been to somelace like Fanfiction.net? Do a search or
> Severus Snape and see how many Mary Sues (or even Gary Stus) you
find.
> (I don't know why I bring this up, since I am adamantly against
> LYCANTHROPEs. In fact, I think Evil!McGonagall is silly, too. I
just
> don't like theories to be disproved with faulty evidence. That, and
I
> like to argue. ;^_^)
>
> The Random Monkey, who, for sme reason, seems to love arguing with
> David
I'm DARRIN! :) David is my evil twin, who wonders why Voldermort
keeps getting this bad rap.
I really try to avoid fanfiction. It always either disappoints me or
angers me. That's not just for HP stuff. It's for all manners of pop
culture.
I'm not sure what faulty evidence you refer to, if you mean what I
said about Lupin being too lucrative to turn evil. I'm just pointing
out that when a character is as popular as Lupin is, you think very
carefully before making him a bad guy.
Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, illustrated it perfectly. When
he introducted a cat into the comic strip, hundreds of fans wrote to
him and said: "More Catbert."
He hadn't named the cat. They just assumed that it would follow
Ratbert, Dogbert, etc...
Quoth Mr. Adams: "When hundreds of readers spontaneously pick the
same name for the character, it seems a good idea to keep him."
I think Lupin falls in the same category.
It's not faulty evidence, just evidence that calls on different
sources -- the mood of the marketplace -- rather than clues in the
dialogue.
Hey, what does LYCANTHROPE stand for? This place is really Acronym
crazy.
Darrin Burnett
-- Once killed a man for calling him David
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive