book differences
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Thu Jun 27 22:56:59 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 40486
> Rosie said:
> >>I noticed from the differences list that they introduced Dean
Thomas
> in the Sorting Ceremony in the US edition too, and described him as
> black. Does anyone know if this was because someone decided he
should
> be introduced earlier? Or was it (as I fear) because they
thought, "Oh
> no, we better point out that some random characters are black to be
> more inclusive, even though we don't both pointing out when people
are
> white, and even though it has no bearing whatsoever on the story."?
I'm
> all for books representing the whole of society... but I think it
looks
> very clumsy to just point out that the odd character is black, or
> Asian, or whatever, and just assume that obviously everyone else is
> white; it looks as if it's just been done so that the publishers
can go
> "Look! We had a single mother/black child/wheelchair user" etc.
> Although maybe it was just to get him mentioned earlier. What do you
> think?<<
Liz Muir said:
>
> It's called PC - politically correct - and it's the reason American
> books and tv shows tend to be not so great. People always have to
worry
> about someone sueing them for being racist/sexist/biased just
because
> their books haven't had a major black/female/whatever character yet.
> The sad part being that they actually have to worry about this.
People
> take consitutional rights and equality way too far over here. When
they
> have a cow about not having a black person or whatever in a story
> because "we're all the same," it seems like they are proving
themselves
> wrong, since if we were all the same, it shouldn't matter what race
the
> characters are. We shouldn't discriminate against others, but you
> shouldn't get special privledges for being a minority either. Does
this
> make any sense?
>
Oh, come on now, lawsuits of this kind, if any exist, are extremely
rare, and have never had any success.
What members of a minority group WILL do, and have done, is refuse to
watch a TV show, or read a book series, or attend a movie, if it too
lily-white. That is their right as consumers.
Inserting minority characters is seen a good business by many
publishers and producers.
But lawsuits? Please, that is PC backlash taken too far, and I'm by
no means a PC fan.
However, if we're going to make a mistake with our Constitutional
rights or concept of equality, I'd rather we take them too far than
not far enough.
Having said that, is the phrasing of the insertion of Dean Thomas
clumsy? Absolutely.
Darrin
-- Doesn't want our European friends to think we're THAT lawsuit
happy yet.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive