Chess Game
adatole
adatole at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 11 07:01:36 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 36314
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "ssk7882" <skelkins at a...> wrote:
> Chelsea wrote:
> You know, I've always wondered about Ron taking the knight's
position
> as well. Ron's obviously a very good chess player. So why would
he
> have chosen to take the place of a *knight?* I am not very good at
> chess myself, but I have played enough of the game to know that the
> knights are, well...
>
> Well, there's just no nice way to say this. They're pieces that one
> often chooses to sacrifice.
*****************
I really enjoy chess, although I have to admit very little talent at
the game.
However, the choice of Knight makes perfect sense. It is the only
piece that can "jump" over other pieces. It has the ability to move
around the board the fastest (ie: is not confined to straight lines).
And while it is often sacrificed near the end of the game (when it is
no longer needed), that is usually after it has "herded" the
opponents pieces into position so that the bishop, queen, or rook
(castle) can swoop in for the final blow.
Just my opinions.
Leon
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive