Physical Harm from an Expelliarmus
erisedstraeh2002
erisedstraeh2002 at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 18 21:40:52 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 44175
In griping about how the next Movie That Must Not Be Named appears to
be handling the duelling club scene in CoS, a thought occurred to me -
the Expelliarmus spell is used to disarm an opponent, yet when Snape
casts an Expelliarmus on Lockhart in the duelling club, "Lockhart was
blasted off his feet: he flew backwards off the stage, smashed into
the wall and slid down it to sprawl on the floor" (Ch. 11, p. 142 UK.
ed.). IIRC, the only other time an Expelliarmus does something other
than disarm, it's when HRH cast it simultaneously at Snape in the
shrieking shack and "Snape was lifted off his feet and slammed into
the wall, then slid down it to the floor, a trickle of blood oozing
from under his hair. He had been knocked out" (Ch. 19, p. 265 UK
ed.).
When Sirius croaks "Expelliarmus" in the shrieking shack in PoA,
Harry and Hermione's wands fly out of their hands, but no physical
harm is done to them. Same goes for when Lupin yells "Expelliarmus"
in the shrieking shack in PoA - HRH's wands fly out of their hands,
but again, no physical harm is done to them. When Harry
yells "Expelliarmus" in CoS, the diary flies out of Draco's hand, but
again, no physical harm to Draco.
I assume the Snape knock-out was a result of the combined force of
three Expelliarmus-es thrown simultaneously. But what about when
Snape blasts Lockhart in the duelling club? Is this a sign of
Snape's power? Or of Lockhart's weakness? Or both? Or does the
physical harm happen when you throw the Expelliarmus in a rage
(since "Snape was looking murderous" when he threw it)? Or can a
wizard cast an Expelliarmus with different intentions to merely
disarm, or to both disarm and cause physical harm?
~Phyllis
who wonders if JKR got the idea for the Anglia's Invisibility Booster
from the invisibility button on Stuart Little's model car
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive