Hagrid's innocence
imamommy at sbcglobal.net
imamommy at sbcglobal.net
Wed Apr 23 04:34:14 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 55949
Faith wrote:
But now that it's been put to rest exactly what happened, and that
Hadrig wasn't responsible, shouldn't he have had his name cleared,
and wand restored?
Me:
I think DD would be hard-pressed to prove to the MoM what exactly
happened in the CoS. After all, Riddle has disappeared, the diary
has been obliterated (and given back to Malfoy), Ginny was knocked
out for most of the time, and adults never want to listen to kids,
anyway. Hagrid, therefore, may not be exonerated for opening the CoS
the first time, though he is cleared in the second.
BTW, I think the movie is very misleading and kind of dumb in this
respect. The final scene with the whole school cheering for Hagrid
*is not canon*. I doubt most of the students even knew Hagrid was
accused and taken to Azkaban.
So yes, he should have his wand restored, but it's never gonna happen
with Fudge fudging up the ministry.
My two knuts
imamommy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive