Harry in NEWT Potions Class? (Was: Is Snape confident?)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sun Dec 28 04:09:31 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 87666
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Kathryn Cawte" <kcawte at n...>
wrote:
> I agree that Harry is still a child - which is why I dislike the way
> Dumbledore tends to not do anything about it when he suspects Harry
is about
> to do something ridiculously dangerous. Last time I said that
someone said
> that since the prophecy only said that Harry could defeat Voldemort
but not
> when he had to let him in case he succeeded in killing him and I
didn't get
> a chance to reply. I strongly disagree with that - the prophecy
says that
> Harry can kill Voldemort of Voldemort can kill him (if you
interpret it that
> way and assume it's definitive truth, which personally I don't),
the fact
> that it *doesn't* say when means that Dumbledore would be perfectly
> However, the fact that Harry is still a child is to me far more of
a reason
> why Harry should be punished regardless of why he is breaking the
rules. He
> isn't old enough yet (or at least he wasn't at the beginning of
OoP, he
> *may* be developing the ability) to distinguish when he has a
*good* reason
> to break the rules and when breaking the rules simply coincides
with what he
> wants to do. By letting him get away with it so often Albus is
deliberately
> or not giving Harry the impression that rules can be broken at will
and you
> won't get punished for it, or at least you won't if you're Harry
Potter. And
> worse he may well end up encouraging that idea in the heads of the
rest of
> the students. I have no problem with Harry being punished despite
the fact
> he had a good reason for doing the right thing. If I feel my
government has
> passed a law which was wrong and chose to disobey it I would still
expect to
> be punished for that - and it is right that I would be, if everyone
> disobeyed laws willy nilly just because they didn't like them the
result
> would be anarchy. Being punished when we do something wrong for the
right
> reasons is part of taking responsibility for our own actions.
Frankly if
> Harry isn't willing to sit detention for breaking a rule in the
cause of
> what is right, then he obviously doesn't feel strongly enough that
what he's
> doing is right, Knowing that he will be punished for doing
something might
> make him think a little harder before rushing in headlong every
time.
>
> K
I have a huge problem with Harry being punished when he is doing the
right thing.
Being punished for something wrong for the right reasons is one
thing, but Harry was not doing anything wrong when fighting
Voldemort - I would say he was breaking the wrong rules to do the
right thing.
I would rather him not to be fighting and after OoP I agree that
Dumbledore manipulates him shamelessly, but if someone was punishing
me for tryign to save the world, I would not bother to try and save
the world next time.
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive