Just suppose Snape is at the heart of it all
allies426
AllieS426 at aol.com
Sun Dec 28 21:48:34 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 87707
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Karen Reid <karenreiduk at y...>
wrote:
> Tanya Swaine wrote:
> Unless of course Harry is the biggest red herring of the lot.>>
>
> Now me:
> The fact that Neville wasn't specifically named as another option
was what got me thinking originally. Whoever labelled the prophecy
in the first place recognised an existing ambiguity over the subject
matter by including the "(?)". If Neville were the only plausible
alternative to Harry why "(?) Harry Potter" and not "Harry Potter or
Neville Longbottom"?
>
Harry, a red herring??? Wouldn't that be a kick in the pants? :) As
for the prophecy, when it was made, Harry and Neville weren't born
yet, so it couldn't be labeled with anything (hence the "?"). Then
when Harry was born, it was assumed to be about him.
Allie
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive