MD Alternative: Lupin is the agent. (WAS Objections to Magic Dishwasher - Shriek
Tom Wall <thomasmwall@yahoo.com>
thomasmwall at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 8 01:27:30 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 51855
I wrote previously:
One more thing. Someone (can't remember
who, just now, nor can I find the post -
sorry about that) has suggested previously
that Dumbledore might have hired Lupin
expressly because he knew that Sirius
Black had escaped from Azkaban, and that
there were indications that he was going
to come to Hogwarts. And that as an old
friend, Lupin might be the best person to
reason with him. Or else, Dumbledore would
have all three of the possible traitors under
his nose.
Annemehr replied:
That may have been me. I did post these ideas in
#49095 (a TBAY post where I explained myself as
sitting on the fences between three theories:
a straightforward reading, where all is as it
seems, an Evil!Snape reading, and MD). I was
actually contemplating emailing you offlist
with this post number just to muddy the waters
in your mind! ;)
I reply:
You well might have muddied the waters in my mind... since they're
already swimming with all of this stuff anyways. *chuckle*
Thanks for pointing out the post number - sorry that I couldn't
reference it, but there are just so many posts and threads to look
for, and I haven't quite reached the point where I bookmark them
yet. ;-)
I wrote previously:
First of all, from my perspective of Dumbledore's perspective
<grin>, it seems far more likely to me, to be sure, that:
a) Dumbledore would send someone the kids trust, and
b) Dumbledore would send someone who was reasonable and not *openly*
bent on a revenge that could foul everything up, and
c) Dumbledore would send someone that Sirius Black would listen to,
so that
d) That person will be able to manage everything calmly, get the
answers out of both Black and Pettigrew, and without saying anything
obvious, get Harry to grant the life-debt, and finally
e) Dumbledore would send someone who could make it look most
plausibly like an accident that Pettigrew escaped.
Annemehr replied:
So is it your premise that Dumbledore and Lupin knew about Pettigrew
all along? Because in my view it is more likely that they always
thought that Sirius *was* the traitor, and thus, in this theory, they
would have formulated the "life debt" plan for Sirius. Then, Lupin
was genuinely shocked to see Pettigrew appear on the map. I also read
Lupin's and Sirius' reconciliation scene in the Shack as genuine.
This leads me to a big problem, here. If Lupin thought that Sirius
was the traitor, he would have had to be absolutely willing to kill
him in order for Harry to truly save his life.
I reply:
Well, no, I'm not sure that think that they have to have known all
along. IMHO, if we think a little laterally here about what was going
on in Lupin's mind when he was perusing the Marauder's Map, one thing
comes into my head... once Lupin saw Pettigrew, he'd have *immediate*
reason to doubt Sirius' guilt, right? I mean, since Pettigrew's
supposed to be dead as a result of Sirius' actions, any sign of
Pettigrew means that something is wrong with the situation. And that
just maybe, Black might be innocent. Innocent, somehow, but that
wouldn't be clear until Lupin was inside the Shrieking Shack.
And then, I was re-reading the ending of PoA, and I noticed that,
time-wise, Dumbledore, with Fudge and Macnair enters the castle just
a few minutes before Lupin comes out. So, *totally* off canon, that
might be just enough time for him to tell Dumbledore that, whatever
the case about the animagical stuff, Pettigrew is around, and that
that's fishy.
So, Dumbledore, perhaps, might have had a plan in development, so to
speak, over how to limit Voldemort's options in the resurrection
field... it's *possible* that he did a little quick thinking and
realized that if Pettigrew is around, there would be a good chance
that Sirius *might* be innocent. He could have sent Lupin with vague
instructions, something to the effect of "find out the story and get
the traitor indebted to Harry."
So, if Lupin just has a vague idea that something's wrong with the
status quo, and he's going just to ascertain the truth, then his
questions at the outset might be read from the perspective of
seriously *wanting* to believe, without yet having proof.
Again, that's totally off canon, but it's plausible, right?
I wrote previously:
1) Lupin says Dumbledore "never knew," not that he "doesn't know."
2) Lupin says "...wondering whether I should tell Dumbledore," not
"I haven't" told Dumbeldore.
3) Lupin says "...whether I should tell Dumbledore that Sirius was
an Animagus," not that "Pettigrew, James, AND Sirius are animagi."
And Annemehr replied:
All of this applies if Dumbledore and Lupin know that Pettigrew was
the secret-keeper and has been hiding out as a rat. If they thought
that Sirius was the traitor, all Lupin's angst about revealing
animagi could have just been true all along.
I reply:
Yeah, you're right. I didn't like writing that bit at all. And if
something along the lines of a quick discussion with Dumbledore
happened after Lupin noticed Pettigrew on the map, then none of this
analysis would be needed... because then he could have been genuinely
surprised about Pettigrew, and the angst could have all been real.
<sighs with relief>
Phew! I didn't like it anyways. Just did it to fill the hole. ;-)
Thanks for pointing that out!
Annemehr wrote:
You know, I like this, mostly. The only part that bugs me is wanting
to read Lupin as genuinely surprised that Pettigrew is alive and
Sirius was innocent. Can we get around this somehow?
I reply:
Well, if we can agree that Lupin might have realized almost
immediately when he saw Pettigrew that something was awry, without
totally exonerating Sirius in his head, and if we can agree that he
went, under some kind of instructions to "find out the truth," or
something like that, then I think we could get around it.
Whaddaya think?
-Tom
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive