Is Harry really in trouble?

[Grey Wolf <greywolf1@jazzfree.com>]

No: HPFGUIDX 52174

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Deborah Panno
<gershwingirl1999 at y...> wrote:
> Todd wrote:
> 
> <<<<<1. If Voldemort used Harry's blood to rebuild himself, then
Voldemort 
> is now forever linked to Harry (wouldn't he then owe hime a life 
> debt?, but I digress).  If two wands made from the same element do 
> not do well when attacking each other, then wouldn't it stand to 
> reason that since Voldemort now has Harry's blood, that he would not 
> be able to hurt Harry?
> 
> 2. Or if they are linked in that way, what if the only way for 
> Voldemort to die would be for Harry to die as well. That would 
> respond well the JKR comment.>>>>>
> 
> Forgive me if I'm trodding on old ground here, but doesn't Harry's
blood now make Voldemort MORE vulnerable? I mean, one of the biggest
platforms of Voldemort's supporters (as well as that of the big guy I
believe) is the survival of purebloods.  In using Harry's blood, the
blood of one who is part muggle, hasn't Voldemort in essence tainted
his own pure blood?  And couldn't this make him more susceptible to
attacks...even the possibility of assassination at the hands of one of
his own "pureblood" DE's?  
> 
> --Debbie

Canon point: Voldemort isn't a pureblood. Tom Riddle is the son of a
witch and a muggle.

Hope that helps,

Grey Wolf