Was Harry specifically conceived to destroy Voldemort?

[Lynda Sappington <ArtsyLynda@aol.com>]

No: HPFGUIDX 52355

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "karywick 
<karenwickersham at a...>" <karenwickersham at a...> wrote:
*snip*
>  Something, or some prediction, had to 
> warn him of something, and yes canon has already hinted at a first 
> *true* prediction.  If the predicton was made by Trelawney and LV 
was 
> brought down by Harry, even if he wasn't killed,  - it still would 
> have been thought to be her first true prediciton, right?  What do 
> the rest of you think?
> 
> Kary :-)

Dumbledore says her prediction at the time of Harry's exam was her 
second "real" prediction and he'd have to give her a raise. With 
Riddle/Voldemort's arrogant attitude toward other wizards who 
actually are good at wizarding, I can't imagine him giving much 
credance to a "seer" who predicts the death of at least one student a 
year and is pretty consistantly wrong in her predictions.  JMHO.  Now 
if HARRY predicted something, especially if he saw it in a dream, I'd 
listen to him -- but not Trelawney.

Lynda