Ginny in GoF
Amy Z <lupinesque@yahoo.com>
lupinesque at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 19 12:18:47 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 52497
Penny wrote:
<<<Guys: It's not Ginny's crying that makes me think she's portrayed
as younger than she is. Not at all. It really isn't. What I said
is that her characterization is consistently painting her as much
younger than her chronological age is. That little whiny girl on the
platform --- I would have pegged her as 8 ...... *at most.* I was as
surprised as Harry to learn at the Burrow that she was starting at
Hogwarts. <g> I really can't help but think that JKR either had a
very odd picture of 10 yr old girls when she wrote that scene .....or
she changed her mind about Ginny's age later. She's also shown
holding Molly's hand .......what .....as late as PoA? Sorry, but I
don't buy it. I know I got lots of ("I'd still hold my mother's
hand" responses the last time I brought that up ...... and all sorts
of cultural arguments). I still don't buy it. That's a depiction of
a much younger (and/or heavily smothered) child than she is.>>>
and earlier:
<<<maybe she is just a plot device in CoS. The fact that her
character has received no further attention or development screams
that loud & clear to me anyway. >>>
I was just listening to GF *again* (we need a new book, she says for
the 500th time) and Ginny does get further attention and
development. No, I'm not talking about her slamming Harry and Ron in
the Unexpected Task. I'm just talking about her presence in the
family. She blushes when Harry grins at her, and then shows a
complete lack of childishness, giggliness, or pointlessness. She
converses in an intelligent way like any member of the family: joins
Ron in explaining to Harry what Fred and George have been up to,
pricks up her ears when Ron* starts to ask about Sirius, laughs at
Bill and Charlie's antics, etc.
I won't quote the entirety of "Weasley's Wizard Wheezes," but here's
an experiment: read that chapter as if GF were the first HP book you
have ever read, and ask yourself at the end of the chapter whether
one of the characters came across as a particularly undeveloped
character, or as a particularly immature adolescent. I don't see
that happening at all here; Ginny seems like a perfectly normal 13-
year-old girl here. Doesn't that show character development since
the infantalized portrayal in the earlier books?
Amy
*who really is being dumb--he's saddled with plot expo, which I hope
some firm hand will edit out of OP so we don't all go nuts. It just
goes ON and ON in GF.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive