Lupin's narrative function Re: Against Evil!Lupin responses
marinafrants <rusalka@ix.netcom.com>
rusalka at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jan 10 02:30:31 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 49526
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999 <foxmoth at q...>" >
Lupin and Sirius have different personalities, no argument there.
> But they have very similar background, the same relationship to
> Harry (which Hermione and Ron definitely *don't* have) and to
> the wizarding world at large. The only thing that good!Lupin can
> do, narratively, that Sirius can't, is turn into a werewolf at an
> inconvenient time--and I don't think that's enough.
I think there's a lot more difference that that. Sirius is a social
outcast due to a limited and reparable external cause. When (if)
his innocence is established, he can take his legitimate place in
wizarding society as a fully trained, law-abiding wizard. He has
hope for redemption and improvement of his lot. Remus is an outcast
due to circumstances that can *never* be fixed, unless a cure for
lycanthropy is found or the entire WW undergoes a complete change in
attitude, and he has no reason to believe this will ever happen. I
don't mean to belittle Sirius' commitment to the cause of the Light,
but aside from the cause he's also fighting for his freedom, his
good name, and the right to be a proper guardian to his godson.
There's a light at the end of the tunnel for Sirius; not so for
Remus.
And do we really know that their backgrounds are "very similar"?
They're both wizards who went to Hogwarts at the same time, but so
are Rond and Draco. We don't know what their family backgrounds
are, but we do know that Remus can't afford a decent set of robes,
while Sirius, even after 12 years in Azkaban, can get his hands on
enough money to buy a Firebolt.
Their roles in Harry's life are very different, too. From the time
his innocence is established in PoA, Sirius takes on the role of the
parent figure to Harry. His position as godfather, rather than just
a friend of James', is emphasized. He's the guy Harry comes to with
his personal problems; he's the guy who offers advice; he's the guy
who signs the permission slips, the guy whom the school calls when
Harry is hurt. Remus, OTOH, is purely a teacher to Harry, never a
parent. The reader isn't encouraged to see him in a fatherly role,
Harry doesn't see him that way, and Remus doesn't appear to see
himself that way. Throughout the school year, he makes no attempt
to forge personal ties with Harry. He doesn't mention knowing James
until he has to, and then he only claims a slight acquaintance.
This despite the fact that if he was evil, claiming a close
friendship with James would be the perfect way to win Harry's
unconditional trust.
This difference is emphasized at the beginning of GoF, when Harry's
scar hurts and he's trying to figure out whom to tell. Once he
realizes that he wants "somebody like a parent," he immedeately
thinks of Sirius. Remus never occurs to him, even though he's a
much more logical choice: he's the DADA expert, after all, and
unlike Sirius he can move around Great Britain without fear of being
arrested and summarily executed if anyone spots him.
> Scott:
> >>Sixth, and possibly the most important Point. It is our choices
> that make us who we are- not our heritage, or ability,
afflictions,
> and so on. This is a central theme of the books. If Lupin were
> evil, well, he'd just be another typical werewolf, wouldn't he?
The
> fact that Lupin is good, kind and dedicated person helps
> illustrate the aforementioned Theme to the reader. Lupin turning
> out evil would go against the 'our choices make us who we are'
> idea that is so strongly presented. Of course, he could turn out
> to be evil, and another werewolf who is truly good could be
> introduced into the story. <<
>
> That's true only if Lupin is the only "monster" in the books--but
> he isn't. There's Hagrid, Madame Maxime, Fleur, and very
> possibly Flitwick and Snape.
I don't think any of the others qualify at all. None of them
are "monsters" in the sense that Lupin is, and none of them face the
same obstacles. Fleur makes no secret of being part-Veela, and it
does nothing to jeopardize her position as a student and Triwizard
champion. All the men worship at her feet, and while the women
might get a bit snippy, there's nothing to keep her from living a
happy and succesfull life as a witch. Flitwick? No evidence that
he's anything but a very short human, and anyway, whatever he is,
he's still a professor, a head of House, a former duelling champion,
and everyone likes him. Snape? Same position as Flitwick, except
for the "everyone likes him" part, and most of his problems come
from being an Ex-DE and an obnoxious git, not from being a "monster."
Hagrid and Madame Maxime come closest, but it's still no go. Giants
and half-Giants are not classified as Beasts, they don't have to
register themselves with any government agency (as evidenced by the
fact that both Hagrid and Maxime manage to keep their heritage
secret into adulthood). Madame Maxime is the headmistress of one of
the three greatest wizarding schools in Europe. Hagrid is outed in
the mainstream press, yet retains his job as teacher, and many
Hogwarts parents support him. Hagrid, with his incomplete education
and initial incompetence at his job, is still more employable and
socially acceptable than Remus.
This is what gives Remus such a strong role in presenting the books'
theme. Of all the characters we've seen so far, he's the one with
the most factors pushing him toward evil -- factors that can't be
changed, that won't ever go away. If, in the face of all that, he
can still make the right choices, then we can truly know that it's
our choices rather than our circumstances that make us what we are.
> Also, if Rowling wants to paint an honest picture of the harm
> done by prejudice, she has to show the damage done to people
> who buy into what's being said against them.
I think that's already being done with Snape and Slytherin House.
Snape comes to school knowing more Dark Curses than anyone else,
gets sorted into "the Dark Wizard factory," and duly becomes a DE.
Sure, he scrapes his way out eventually, but what about the other
Slytherins of his generation, and now their children? There has been
plenty of discussion on this list about how people's expectations
about Slytherins can and do become self-fulfillig prophecies. I
think it would be much more effective for future books to explore
*that* than to spring an Evil!Lupin twist on us.
Marina
rusalka at ix.netcom.com
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive