Vernon's Drill Co; (was Dursley's bribed?, charmed? or afraid?)
Tom Wall <thomasmwall@yahoo.com>
thomasmwall at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 28 15:08:33 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 50889
Tanya wrote:
Dagnabbits! I just might have to respectfully agree
with you here, because I've just come across this
passage (PoA/2) that reads:
"...Uncle Vernon bored them all with a long talk
about Grunnings, his drill-making company..."
*respectful grumbling* I concede.
Andrea replied:
I ... submit ... owning a company does not mean
one is automatically disgustingly wealthy with
a huge house. ...edited.. So I don't think it's
necessarily a given that Vernon either IS or ISN'T
the owner of Grunnings. ... He's definitely upper
management at the least, though.
bboy_mn wrote:
Given what Ali said about the use of the term 'Director'
in the UK, and looking at Dudley's birthday gifts,
which I estimate at between us$800 and us$1,000, I'm
inclined to give Vernon a promotion. He is not longer
management but an executive; probably the equivalent of a
vice president.
And I reply:
Two things here -
1) $800-$1000 for the gifts? Again:
"...Harry and Uncle Vernon watched Dudley unwrap
the racing bike, a video camera, a remote control
airplane, sixteen new computer games, and a VCR. He
was ripping the paper off a gold wristwatch when..."
(PS/SS 22)
That's only 21 of his 39 presents, and frankly, I'm
very skeptical of $1000 as an upward limit for the
just the 21 gifts we have heard of from the passage,
never mind the remaining 18, whatever they may be.
I think we're talking at least double that
($1500-$2000 U.S.) for the birthday gifts. Minimum -
even that estimate may be low depending on how much
the Dursleys give credence to brand names and so forth.
2) I don't want to be too nitpicky about
Vernon's position, but canon (PS/SS 1) says that
Vernon is "the" director, not "a" director. Vice
presidents and managers come in groups. I think we're
talking *minimum* presidency, maybe even part ownership...
there's not necessarily any mention of the company
being public, so that would work.
STILL, I want to say that I agree with Tanya (even
though she conceded :-P) that I don't think that
he's an owner - I really think that the distinction
between executive and owner is so great that JKR
would have said something to that effect if he was
the owner. After all "ownership" implies more of an
entrepreneurial spirit than mere management. A spirit,
I'll throw in, that I don't really think Uncle Vernon
has.
And about the Dursley's home, I mean, we know that
they've been there for at least, what, 14-15 years?
Maybe they're moving up in the world and will be
looking for new digs in one of the subsequent
books?
-Tom
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive