OoP: Has Anyone Seen Redeemable Draco???
komagata_mai
irreality at mit.edu
Thu Jul 3 02:06:27 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 66953
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "jenny_ravenclaw" wrote:
> Someone (sorry,
> forgot who!) mentioned that Draco is the only one who can give
Harry a
> run for his money, and I must disagree.
They said he was the only one who could give him a run for his money
in terms of psychological deprivation, not in terms of magic.
Not saying I agree or disagree with this statement. I just think
there is no non-movie canon to prove or disprove this.
I think, a more accurate statement would be to say someone like
Snape probably had neglectful/abusive caretakers, and could act as
counterpoint to harry in that respect. Sirius, I dont know so much.
I don't think he had a bad childhood in the same sense harry or
snape might have had a bad childhood. He chose to turn away from his
family and thus was disowned and kicked out (frankly, a good
choice), but if he had been like his brother Regulus, i doubt he had
neglectful or abusive parents. Just because they were evil does not
imply that statement(or else we could make the same argument for
draco).
The reason Draco intrigues people (at least, this is why he
intrigues me), is that he could be a good conterpoint for harry if
we had information on him, whether he remains evil or not. Sure,
snape was evil and turned to good is a counterpoint to Harry, but he
is an adult. He is a counterpoint to Sirius or James. I feel there
should be someone his age which has to make choices(for good or
ill), but knows a morality system which is opposite to harry's (as
opposed to being told of what adults have done in the past). His
character is just too shallow at the moment, which I find
disappointing, and I cannot make a judgement call on someone whom
all I know about them is about 5 distinct lines of dialogue. Wish
there was more to go on.
mai
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive