OOP: Sirius thoughts ...
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Jul 5 19:05:51 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 67618
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "minetourjunkie"
<sarah_wendling at h...> wrote:
> The space for the spoilers ...
>
>
> Pippin said (with some snipping):
> > > Sirius never had a sense of purpose beyond catching up
with Peter
> > > and fighting Voldemort.
>
> Marianne replied:
> > That may very well be true, but I think you could cut the man
maybe
> > an inch of slack in that he's spent most of the past 14 years
in
> > isolation from other humans. He hasn't had much of a
chance to reconnect to wizard life outside of the narrow focus of
concentrating on Voldemort and Peter. But, we'll never know as
that story arc has been cut.<<
I'm not saying Sirius deserved to die because of his flaws,
anymore than I would say that drunk drivers deserve to cause
accidents. Saying that Sirius's flaws led to his death is not
saying that he deserved to die on account of them.
>Sarah said:
> First off, I think Sirius did have other senses of purpose (can
you pluralize that?): protecting Harry for starters.
<snip>
> Again, I'm not sure his life was organized around the fight
against evil. A good deal of his motivation seems to come from
guilt over James' death and a need to protect Harry at all costs
to make up for his earlier mistakes. And he seems to genuinely
like the boy. I wouldn't blame Sirius for his death either - I
mean,
if your kid/surrogate kid was in mortal peril, are you gonna sit
around and hope for the best? Especially if you were a good
fighter? I don't think wanting to protect Harry is a flaw. <
That is where we disagree, I think. Harry, though still legally a
child, does not need protection any more. Sirius spends most of
OOP feeling sorry for himself because he can't take care of
Harry, even though he knows in his heart Harry doesn't need to
be looked after or protected any more. That's what I mean about
losing his sense of purpose. There was work for Sirius to do in
the house--making it fit to live in and taking care of Kreacher--but
he refused to do it.
The original poster said that Sirius needed to die because Harry
needed an additional reason to hate Voldemort. I think it would
be closer to say Harry needed an additional reason to hate
Snape, but that's not the only reason Sirius had to go.
At the beginning of the story Harry thinks his godfather's attitude
is kinda cool. IMO, JKR wants us to realize that's a problem for
Harry. Having the attitude lead to the godfather's death is a lot
more effective and dramatic than having the godfather say, "Gee,
I've been making everybody around me miserable. I guess
acting arrogant and superior, holding a lifelong grudge, and
refusing to obey orders even when I know they're for my own
good and other peoples' isn't the way to go."
Sirius didn't get a chance to solve his attitude problems because
the reader has to realize that Harry's life is at stake if he doesn't
solve his--or develops new ones. Harry hasn't only got to defeat
Voldemort, he has to do it while remaining humble, letting go of
grudges and considering other peoples' welfare. If he doesn't do
that, he may well become an agent of evil even if Voldemort
himself is defeated.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive