More Snape thoughts
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Jul 8 22:17:01 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 68476
My comments on various Snape threads
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "stlcole"
<cole.bitting at a...>
wrote:
> The one plot problem I have is Snape's attempt to interfere with
> Quirell in PS. Certainly, Voldemort was aware of Snape's
opposition. Shouldn't Volde be highly suspicious of Snape's
alligence, even if Snape can plausibly argue that he - Snape -
didn't know that Quirell > = Voldemort? Any one else bugged by
this plot element?<<
Oh, you're not the first person to notice that one! :) But Snape can
claim that he thought that Quirrell's suspicious behavior was
being sanctioned by Dumbledore in order to test Snape's loyalty.
Since Voldemort probably has no more idea than we do why
Dumbledore should trust Snape, this would make sense to him.
Personally, I think the answer to why Dumbledore trusts Snape
was hinted at back in CoS, when Dumbledore said that only
those with real loyalty to him could summon Fawkes. Perhaps
the Order are those who have proved their loyalty in this fashion?
Even if Voldemort does suspect that Snape is spying, it would be
far more useful to let him go on doing it, while making sure that
no really useful information leaks out, than to kill Snape and run
the risk of having him replaced by an undetected agent.
If Snape has suspected all along that Harry will develop a link to
Voldemort's mind (did he understand the significance of Harry
clutching at his scar in book one?) then insuring that Harry
absolutely *hates* him and thinks it's mutual is probably the
best cover Snape could possibly have.
As to the question of why Dumbledore can't trust Snape to teach
DADA, we've seen that in the upper levels of the course, practical
DADA requires the equivalent of live ammo exercises.
Somebody has to cast dark spells so that the students can learn
to recognize and block them, as Fake!Moody does with the fourth
years in GoF. Putting Snape in a position where he would have
no choice but to use Dark Magic doesn't seem like a good idea.
Perhaps when Voldemort is no more...
One idea I haven't seen in all the musings on Snape's Worst
Memory is that the chapter title simply reflects Harry's point of
view. Harry isn't given to musing on Snape nearly as much as
we are <g> and it just hasn't dawned on him that Snape would
have worse memories than the one he saw.
Also, the memories you want to hide most are not necessarily
the ones that are the most painful. Harry wants to hide Cho's
kiss. Certainly he has far worse memories than that, but it's the
one that he doesn't want Snape prying into, because it would
make him feel so vulnerable. Snape probably feels the same
way about the James memory.
>From what we've seen legilimency only gives brief glimpses into
another's past, but perhaps a legilimens can delve more deeply
into a memory if desired. If that is the case, Snape would also
have to consider which memories might prove especially
attractive to Harry. Harry probably isn't going to want to tune in
on Snape being punished by Voldemort, but his father's
schooldays would be irresistibly intriguing. Of course by storing
the memory in the Pensieve, Snape brought about, with typical
JKR irony, the very thing he was trying to avoid.
Still, why only three memories, when we know that Snape and
James were regular antagonists? Perhaps most of their
contests were more equal.
Pippin
who always burst into uncontrollable tears when she was
teased as a child and thinks that eleven year old Snape had the
same problem, hence Snivellus.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive