Hermione attempted murder!
HunterGreen
patientx3 at aol.com
Fri Jul 11 22:25:57 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 69553
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "vecseytj" <vecseytj at t...>
wrote:
I have been reading this post for a while... and no one says
> anything about the fact the Umbridge was about to do an unforgivable
> curse on the kids so they would talk! Umbridge was going to torture
> these children until they talked! With the same curse that put
> Longbottoms parents in the Mental ward. I think Hermione did what
she
> *HAD* to do to protect the "gang".
>
I completely agree with that. Was anyone else *really* disturbed by
the fact that she was going to use crucio on Harry? The unforgivable
curses had to be *approved* for use on DEATH EATERS, its certainly
inappropriate to use on a fifteen-year-old who is unable to defend
himself and hasn't done anything (violently) wrong. I know that there
is no actual prove that she said she was going to use it besides
Harry and the others word, but I was really disappointed that she
simply left the school in disgrace as opposed to being arrested for
nearly using the cruciatus curse on a teenager AND sending two
dementers after Harry and Dudley. If using a forgivable curse is a
LIFE sentence in prison, than surely intending to use one (nearly
going through with it, the spell was halfway out) is a serious
offence. Basically, I wasn't disturbed at all when Hermione led
Umbridge into the forest, obviously Umbridge had reached the point of
out of control.
-Rebecca
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive