A new interpretation of the prophecy

[kattfirmin1]

No: HPFGUIDX 70038

"koinonia02" <Koinonia2 at h...> wrote:
> 
> Honestly, I don't think we are going to see Harry kill Voldemort. 
I 
> know that is what the prophecy says but I think something else 
will 
> happen. I just don't know what. Not that I would think any less of 
> Harry if he was the cause of Voldemort's death. 
> 
> On another note, I'm afraid the time turner is going to come into 
> play. I have never been a fan of time travel so I'm hoping I'm 
wrong.
> 
> "K"

I don't think that time travel will come into play for the final 
outcome.  Nor do I really see Harry "killing" Voldemort.  First, JKR 
may take the Disney way out.  The two antagonists are fighting, and 
even though our hero wont actually kill the villian, the villian is 
so focused on killing our hero that he brings about his own death.  
(Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, etc).

Second, I feel that Wormtail may have something to do with it.  DD 
has stated that Wormtail owes Harry one.  I don't think that 
Wormtail's debt has been paid off yet, and Wormtail just might 
possibly turn against LV at some critical time, possibly setting off 
a chain of events that causes LV's death.  Wouldn't that still be 
considered dying by Harry's hand?  (Because of an action Harry 
performed, it brought down LV's downfall?) 

Just a thought, the prophesy never says "HE".  It uses the 
pronoun "ONE".  Wouldn't it be funny if the whole series was one red 
herring, and instead of Harry or even Neville defeating LV, it was a 
girl?  Maybe Harry and Ginny (grin) will have a baby girl in July, 
(it never states a year,) and this child time travels back in time 
to help her parents fight LV?  I doubt it, but it's fun to speculate.

Katrina