A new interpretation of the prophecy

[kattfirmin1]

No: HPFGUIDX 70170

"kattfirmin1" wrote
> > Just a thought, the prophesy never says "HE".  It uses the 
> > pronoun "ONE".  Wouldn't it be funny if the whole series was one 
> red herring, and instead of Harry or even Neville defeating LV, it 
> > was a girl?  Maybe Harry and Ginny (grin) will have a baby girl 
> > in July, (it never states a year,) and this child time travels 
> > back in time to help her parents fight LV?  I doubt it, but it's 
> > fun to speculate.
> > 
> > Katrina

"scoutmom21113" wrote:
 
> Since when has JKR given straight-forward clues?  IMHO, there will 
> almost certainly be a twist to the prophesy, and Dumbledore will 
> make a comment about how prophesies can't be trusted or can be 
> misinterpreted. <grin>
> 
> I thought of your 'it's a girl' theory too, but later it 
> says "...and the Dark lord will mark him as equal, but he will 
have 
> power the Dark Lord knows not ..."  So I guess that leaves out our 
> female heros. 
> 
> Ravenclaw Bookworm

Yea, my husband pointed that out to me later last night.  (D'oh!)  
Oh well...I guess partly to redeem myself, some people feel that the 
prophesy refers to more than one person, so maybe there's still 
hope...  It will be cool to see how this prophesy plays out though.

Katrina