The Prefect Question (was Head Boy)
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Mon Jul 14 13:31:19 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 70178
Kathryn wrote:
>
> People keep on (on every mailing list I'm on) asking about this.
They say that because Remus was a prefect in the fifth year that
James wasn't a prefect *ever*. Do we know that the school doesn't
appoint *more* prefects in the sixth and/or seventh year? If we stick
to just two per house per year that's a total of 24 plus Head boy and
Head girl, which seems rather low to me for the size that JKR says
Hogwarts is. Certainly the school I was at pretty much the entire of
the 7th year were prefects (with the exception of those like the
Twins who shouldn't *ever* be put in a position of authority)
The number of prefects and when they are chosen is a question I raise
in another post, but there is another possibility regarding James and
Lupin and their being prefects, assuming there is only the one.
Lupin could have resigned, or was forced to resign, after the
Shrieking Shack incident.
That could have been part of the deal that kept Snape quiet about the
whole thing. D-Dore doesn't appear to have wiped Snape's memory of
the incident. Snape, though he talks in PoA about being "forced" to
keep quiet, might have demanded Lupin no longer have authority over
him as a condition of not running to the Daily Prophet.
Or Lupin, knowing that it was a very close call and he could have
killed not only Snape, but James, resigned on his own.
James, who after all is talented and bright and had just shown some
maturity with the Shrieking Shack thing, gets the job.
Darrin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive