HP and the Room of Love (clues to book 7?)

[M.Clifford]

No: HPFGUIDX 71842

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Ivan Vablatsky 
<ibotsjfvxfst at y...> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> In 2003 HP the divine source will seek out new geniuses to rebuild 
the pillars of the way of Liberation, just as in 1990 a literary 
master such as JK Rowling was, and 2000 years previous was St Paul 
etc.
> Hans :
>  
My theory is that the Original Spirit (call it God, call it Tao, call 
it what you like) is making a great call for his children to return 
to him. We are all muggles. The Potter of the universe has been 
sending owls to us for millennia but we've hammered all the entrances 
to our heart shut. 

Valky(me):
In another post there was a question about the path of liberation 
written in code and sold to us as fiction. The writer asked; Why?
To me, and pardon if I am mistaken, it sounded cynical. As though the 
writer had interpreted thes words to mean that the Hp books were a 
sugar coating on a bitter pill.
Again, pardon please, if I took that the wrong way, whomever asked 
that question. 
At first I gave a short answer. But thinking about it and realising 
the possible cynicism implied I think some of my own opinion needs to 
be added to this thread as clarification.
I am a strong believer that liberation is the greatest story ever 
known to man.
As a child I dreamed of my own story with the theme of liberation, 
compassion and sacrifice by someone whose greatest strength is the 
power of her heart.
I never wrote it. 
I saw it, though. I even wrote the first chapter or I think two 
chapters. I can't remember. I lost the work years ago.
My point is that the liberation story and JK's Harry Potter story are 
both in their own right uniquely brilliant. The inspiration of 
liberty stirs us, and it has stirred JK Rowling. But that takes 
nothing from her genius as the author of HP. I was stirred by the 
spirit myself and didn't write the book.
If any skepticism of this theory stems from the thought that it takes 
glory away from JK for her magnificent works, then I hope that it is 
hereby replaced with this understanding.
All art is inspired, and it is genuis that brings it into reality in 
such a glorius way as an epic series of literature.

In a little aside I was bouncing around  a little theory regarding 
the name Bellatrix Lestrange.
Bellatrix is a close likeness of the french term 'Belles Lettres' 
which is Art that is beautiful but that is all. It has no deep 
measure of significance. 
The name Bellatrix Letrange leads me to believe that Jk alludes to 
meaning here. Relevant to herself and her work. Bella is a character 
with the shallow attributes that JK herself aspires to be above.
I am thinking perhaps JK hopes to gently show her readers that she is 
not Bellatrix. And her art is not meaningless.
Its a shaky limb for me to go out on the reference is thin. But i 
will post because I think there may be a reason for the likeness.
   
Hans:
> Recently there was a post from someone who said that she loved 
Harry as much as any living human being of flesh and bone. Well I'm 
sure she's not the only one. There are probably many millions. Why? 
Because Harry and his boundless compassion is the archetype of the 
selfless, self-sacrificing liberator who has appeared in the flesh 
repeatedly in world history. Look at people like Prince Gautama, 
Mani, Apollonius of Thyana, Krishna, Moses, Jesus of Nazareth. These 
are the great Jupiter leaders who form armies to fight Voldemort and 
return to the Father of Lights. The Gnostics ("The Knowers") called 
such a group "The Thirteenth Aeon". I'm sure JK Rowling is making a 
veiled reference to this in the term "platform 9 and 3 quarters".
> 
Valky:
I too love Harry as though he were real. I guess I am not embarrased 
to say it.
And I agree it is his compassion and selflessness that makes us fall 
in love with him. There is hardly a way to avoid it. When such a 
profound expression of love exists in any form we are instantly 
smitten. Well some of us anyway. :D



> I wrote:
>  
 >> [...]Will it be third time lucky for Hermione in placing the boy 
on his correct throne in book six?<<
> 
> Hans:
> 
> I'm sure she will, either in book 6 or 7.
> 

> Valky:
I am very glad that JK has given us Hermione. I believe that through 
her we reach Harry in a way. Probably why it is the ship that sails 
most high on the water. Hermione is a little more than JK, she is our 
hands to touch Harry Potter with and our voice to speak to him.
In OoP when she first sees him she runs over and smothers him in a 
warm hug. 
That's precisely what we did when the book hit the shelves, is it not.

>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]