Flight to London - Speed Questioned

Steve bboy_mn at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 25 01:53:59 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 72959

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Random <random832 at r...> wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, Jul 20, 2003, at 17:33 America/Indianapolis, Steve wrote:
> 
> > ... There is a reason why no propeller driven plane ever exceeded 
> > the speed of sound. No  matter how streamlined the body or how 
> > powerful the engines, the propellers themselves created enough of 
> > an aerodynamic barrier to prevent the plane achieving those 
> > speeds. So a static bubble would screw up the aerodynamic; ...

> Random:
> 
> Can you find me a reference on this? 
> 

bboy_mn:
Sure... www.PBS.org ; I saw it on a multi-part documentary on the
history of flight. 


> Random:
> Also, if we take the speed to be 500mph, it is not "near sound 
> speed", as the speed of sound is closer to 800mph.
> 

bboy_mn:
Well, I was recalling my old school days where we generally accepted
that the speed of sound was 1,000ft/s or 680mph. But you are right,
depending on altitude and air temperature it is between 700 and 800mph. 


> > bboy_mn org:
> > 
> > Thestrals would be able to fly is if its wings were outside the
> > static bubble. No airflow means no lift,..., the Thestral
> > couldn't fly.

> Random:
> 
> Or we could say the wings are decorative and the flight is entirely 
> magic-powered.
> 

bboy_mn:
That's what I said, they fly by magic.


 
> > bboy_mn:
> > You forgot what it's like to travel by Floo powder. There is a
> > sensation of physically moving through space, ..., you see
> > fireplaces wizzing by, ... In addition, there is a
> > deafening 'roaring' sound and the sensation of cold ... slapping
> > your face. 


> Random:
> 
> ..., it seems rather more like space-folding than anything else. 
> i.e. the distance he covers is much shorter than the outside-world 
> distance between the endpoints.
> 

bboy_mn:
Someone once explained a theory that sounds very much like 'space
folding', but they used the example of a pleat (A fold in cloth made
by doubling the material upon itself). Although we, at that time were
talking more about physical space like Diagon Alley.

So this time/space-folding, am I right in assuming a 'pleat' would be
a good analogy? The span of time&space between two points is folded
back out of sight, thereby, creating the appearance that two points
are near by. This could be similar to a worm hole. The time and
distance through a worm hole is less that the time and distance
between the real points. In sense, the worm hole or time/space-fold
path is the distance between the two adjoining folds in the pleat, and
the real distance is all the 'material' that is hidden behind those
adjoining folds.

So you say a Thestral flys in real-time using a static warp bubble to
block the wind. I never said that wasn't possible, I even said it had
some merit. What I did say, is that while possible, I didn't
personally feel that it was likely. However, if my description of the
'time/space-fold' above is reasonably accurate, and that it is also a
reasonably likely explanation of Floo and Portkey travel, then I say,
it also explains the magical flight of Thestrals. As a Thestral flys,
it creates a turbulence in space/time, this turbulence in space/time
manifests itself as small folds in the surrounding space/time that
allow the Thestral to cover distance much faster that the perceive
real-time flighing speed.

Am I actually right? Well, we'll never know. It's just a thought. But
I am sticking to it. So ultimately, we'll just have to agree to disagree.


> Random:
> 
> And you know how teleportation feels, do you?? it could be 

bboy_mn:
I'm pretty sure that I made a point of saying that what Apparation
feels and looks like is an unknown at this point in the book. 

I also pointed out advantages to your method; it's very simple and
straight forward. But it does have it's drawbacks, and I still think
there is information in the book (I gave examples), that leans the
likelihood toward my idea. And now that you have brought up
'space/time-folding', you have given me exactly what I was trying to
say, that perceived distance is not proportional to real distance. The
thing I describe as 'slow motion apparation' is simple traveling past
the magically created folds in space/time.

Really, it was just a thought.

bboy_mn






More information about the HPforGrownups archive