Dumbledore's Invisibility
meltowne
meltowne at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 26 01:30:30 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 73178
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "corinthum" <kkearney at s...>
wrote:
> Am I the only person who didn't intepret Dubledore's statement
> literally? I suppose that in a magical world such as this, the
> literal interpretation might be the obvious one, but it really never
> occurred to me until people started using Dumbledore's supposed
> invisibility talents in their theories...
> I think it very possible that Dumbledore was simply hiding, not
> invisible, when he observed Harry and Ron with the Mirror of
> Erised.
I think it comes down to how one is invisible - when you put the
cloak on, does it bend the light around the cloak, or cause you to
look past it? If the latter, that might explain both
Dumbledoresability to remain unseen, and his ability to see those
hidden by a cloak.
Dumbledore's mind is clearly very strong. Perhaps he manipulates the
mind of someone he doesn't want to see him. Perhaps also, even if
the cloak cuases his eyes not to see someone, he is so used to
scanning the room for the thoughts of others that he still knows they
are there. Particularly if they are giving off strong vibes of fear
that they might get caught.
We are told that Muggles often don't see Wizard buildings simply
because their minds trick them. We see this with the Leaky Cauldron,
and with Grimauld Place. When Muggles see the students passing
through the gateway at Platform 9-3/4, it doesn't make sense to them,
so their brains choose not to see it.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive