Fudge and Gringotts
flying_meese
original_gt at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 30 15:55:09 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 74177
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "tomatogrower88"
<tomatogrower88 at y...> wrote:
> I think JKR in letting Harry's story be printed in the Quibbler is
> letting us see that some of the stories are based in fact. That
this
> is a paper willing to print things other papers won't. I do think
that
> Fudge could have been trying to take over Gringotts. Key persons
> -think Umbridge- do not like magical creatures with near-human
> intelligence (pg 754 OOP american). Fudge could be trying to get
rid
> of the goblins. As for cooking them in pies I do not think this is
> true but if you think something is "sub human" you might not have
a
> problem killing it. How far would Fudge go? I think it could be
> setting up events in later books on who sides with Lord Thingy and
who
> does not. So how far will Fudge go?
>
> Myrth
I think that most tabloid stories have a base in some fact. (Notice
the use of the word most not all) However of these fact based
stories wild opinions are allowed to take flight and what we end up
with is the crazy story that the fact becomes. It's not unlike what
happens on this board. There are some crazy theories that are based
around one piece of evidence that JKR has left and we run with it.
Now many times you can look at a wild and preposterous idea and find
some bit of truth in it despite a flawed progression from that
truth, but sometimes these wild theories are truths that people
can't or won't bring themselves to believe for whatever reason.
FM
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive