Wand Switching (Was Peter vs. Sirius once again)
Kirstini
kirst_inn at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Jun 7 13:48:33 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 59505
gamer5255 wrote: Picture it: the last ANYONE saw of Peter
before this incident was right before he transformed. Why is
everyone convinced he left directly afterwards? My theory is, he
SWITCHED BLACK'S WAND WITH HIS OWN. It's plausible that part of
Sirius's 'shock' reaction is dropping his wand, right? And he might
not notice a rat at his feet in that same shock. So, Pettigrew, as
a rat, switches the wands(carrying them in his teeth) so the wand
that performed the 'explosion' spell is at Sirius's feet, and
the 'innocent' wand is near Peter's robes.
Kirstini (popping her head up from the life du lurk):
Hello! The trouble with this theory is that we know that wands,
being personalised to the wizard/witch, don't work as well when used
by someone else. Peter is not a very good wizard - we have numerous
canon references to back this up - so therefore would be even more
limited in the "Flesh of the Servant" spell without his own wand.
I have a funny feeling that all this constant reference to
Pettigrew's ineptitude is significant. He appears to have managed
most spells pretty well so far...
I don't think anyone even bothered to PI Sirius's wand, as there
was enough "evidence" to convict him anyway: presumed Secret Keeper,
dead Muggles, Pettigrew's finger.
anyway, back to lurk,
Kirstini
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive